Socioeconomic status, resources, psychological experiences, and emotional responses: A test of the reserve capacity model
Socioeconomic status, resources, psychological experiences, and emotional responses: A test of the reserve capacity model
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.386
复制
发表时间：
2005-02-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Matthews, KA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gallo, LC;Bogart, LM;Matthews, KA
本研究使用生态瞬时评估来测试储备容量模型（L.C.）的几个原则。Gallo & K. A.马修斯，2003年）。不同社会经济地位（SES）的妇女（N = 108）在2天内监测积极和消极的社会心理体验和情绪。心理和社会资源的措施汇总代表储备能力可用于管理压力。较低的社会经济地位与较少的控制感和积极的影响和更多的社会压力。控制和紧张有助于SES和积极情感之间的关联。较低的SES引起更大的积极的，但不是消极的情绪反应的心理社会经验。低社会地位的妇女相对于高社会地位的妇女拥有较少的资源，资源有助于社会地位和日常经历之间的关联。
The current study used ecological momentary assessment to test several tenets of the reserve capacity model (L.C. Gallo & K. A. Matthews, 2003). Women (N = 108) with varying socioeconomic status (SES) monitored positive and negative psychosocial experiences and emotions across 2 days. Measures of intrapsychic and social resources were aggregated to represent the reserve capacity available to manage stress. Lower SES was associated with less perceived control and positive affect and more social strain. Control and strain contributed to the association between SES and positive affect. Lower SES elicited greater positive but not negative emotional reactivity to psychosocial experiences. Women with low SES had fewer resources relative to those with higher SES, and resources contributed to the association, between SES and daily experiences.