Using a Split-Ballot Survey to Explore the Robustness of the 'MIP' Question in Agenda-Setting Research: A Methodological Study
Using a Split-Ballot Survey to Explore the Robustness of the 'MIP' Question in Agenda-Setting Research: A Methodological Study
复制标题
使用分票调查探索议程设置研究中“MIP”问题的稳健性：一项方法论研究
DOI：
10.1093/ijpor/edm003
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Dixie Evatt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Young Min;Salma Ghanem;Dixie Evatt
在议程设置研究中，“最重要问题”问题的三个方面被用来衡量公众对问题的重视程度。在一项全州范围的调查中，一种分裂选票的设计比较了社会参照系和个人参照系的公共议程版本，使用传统术语“问题”和“议题”的版本，以及问题顺序的影响。在所有三组比较中都发现了不同版本之间的高度相关性。
Three aspects of the ‘most important problem’ question used in agenda-setting research to measure issue salience among the public were examined. A split-ballot design in a state-wide survey compared versions of the public agenda with a social frame of reference versus a personal frame of reference, versions using the traditional term ‘problem’ versus ‘issue’, and the effects of question order. High correlations between the different versions were found in all three sets of comparisons.