Equivalent bow imperfections for use in design by second order inelastic analysis
Equivalent bow imperfections for use in design by second order inelastic analysis
复制标题
通过二阶非弹性分析进行设计时使用的等效弓形缺陷
DOI:
10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.065
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Walport F
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Walport F
The stability of compression members is typically assessed through buckling curves, which include the influence of initial geometric imperfections and residual stresses. Alternatively, the capacity may be obtained more directly by carrying out either an elastic or an inelastic second order analysis using equivalent bow imperfections that account for both geometric imperfections and residual stresses. For design by second order elastic analysis, following the recommendations of EN 1993-1-1, the magnitudes of the equivalent bow imperfections can either be back-calculated for a given member to provide the same result as would be obtained from the member buckling curves or can be taken more simply as a fixed proportion of the member length. In both cases, a subsequent M–N (bending + axial) cross-section check is also required, which can be either linear elastic or linear plastic. For design by second order inelastic analysis, also referred to as design by geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis with imperfections (GMNIA) there are currently no suitable recommendations for the magnitudes of equivalent bow imperfections and, as demonstrated herein, it is not generally appropriate to use equivalent bow imperfections developed on the basis of elastic analysis. Equivalent bow imperfections suitable for use in design by second order inelastic analysis are therefore established in the present paper. The equivalent bow imperfections are calibrated against benchmark FE results, generated using geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis with geometric imperfections ofL/1000 (Lbeing the member length) and residual stresses. Based on the results obtained, an equivalent bow imperfection amplitudee0=αL/150 (αbeing the traditional imperfection factor set out in EC3), is proposed for both steel and stainless steel elements and shown to yield accurate results. The reliability of the proposed approach is assessed, using the first order reliability method set out in EN 1990, against the benchmark FE ultimate loads, where it is shown that partial safety factors of 1.0 for steel and 1.1 for stainless steel can be adopted.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1978
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Maquoi;J. Rondal
通讯作者:
J. Rondal
影响因子:
12.8
作者:
L. Gardner;X. Yun;Andreas Fieber;L. Macorini
通讯作者:
L. Macorini
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Buonopane;B. Schafer
通讯作者:
B. Schafer
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Walport F
通讯作者:
Walport F
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Francisco Sena Cardoso;K. Rasmussen
通讯作者:
K. Rasmussen