Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge
Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge
复制标题
不谦虚的建议：通过设计和知识进行研究
DOI：
10.1145/2702123.2702400
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lone Koefoed Hansen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jeffrey Bardzell;Shaowen Bardzell;Lone Koefoed Hansen
本文认为，为了使设计研究合法化，并将设计研究作为研究加以利用，人机界面研究者需要探索和澄清设计研究对象对知识的贡献，从而为设计研究提供理论支持。利用艺术和人文科学中的美学传统，我们认为，虽然对象设计者的意图很重要，注释是表达它们的良好机制，但对对象的批判性接受同样是RTD在人机界面中产生更广泛知识影响的基础。之所以需要这样的学术批评，正是因为设计对象的意义可能是取之不尽的；它们无法被简单而充分地解释。本文通过对Sputniko的(批判性)设计小说月经机器的多层次分析，探索了设计对象如何通过以非还原的方式处理复杂的设计问题空间，提出新的联系和区别，并体现跨越时间和思维的设计思想和过程，从而共同产生知识。
The paper offers theoretical support for research through design (RtD) by arguing that in order to legitimize and make use of research through design as research, HCI researchers need to explore and clarify how RtD objects might contribute to knowledge. Leveraging the tradition of aesthetics in the arts and humanities, we argue that while the intentions of the object's designer are important and while annotations are a good mechanism to articulate them, the critical reception of objects is equally foundational to RtD's broader knowledge impacts within HCI. Such a scholarly critical reception is needed precisely because of the potential inexhaustibility of design objects' meanings; their inability to be paraphrased simply and adequately. Offering a multilevel analysis of the (critical) design fiction Menstruation Machine by Sputniko!, the paper explores how design objects co-produce knowledge, by working through complex design problem spaces in non-reductive ways, proposing new connections and distinctions, and embodying design ideas and processes across time and minds.