Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers.
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale in employed Japanese family caregivers.
复制标题
日本版护理界面工作量表在受雇的日本家庭护理人员中的信度和效度。
DOI：
10.1111/ggi.14082
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
Kiyoko Kamibeppu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mariko Sakka;Sachiko Kita;Iori Sato;Takafumi Soejima;Hisashi Eguchi;Masahito Tokita;Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani;Akihito Shimazu;Kiyoko Kamibeppu
目的本研究的目的是开发一个日本版本的照顾界面工作量表（J-CIWS）与雇用日本家庭careful.MethodsPermission使用从开发商的原始CIWS。CIWS包含20个项目：10个测量护理接口工作（CIW）和10个测量工作接口护理（WIC）。反应采用5分制李克特量表测量。J-CIWS是通过正向和反向翻译以及对受雇家庭照顾者的认知访谈开发的。本研究以网路调查方式，对116位受雇家庭照顾者进行问卷调查，并对78位参与者进行复测。问卷项目包括J-CIWS和人口因素。进行因子分析以确定J-CIWS因子结构。根据已知组、收敛效度和判别效度评估有效性。通过计算Cronbach α检验内部一致性。重测信度进行了检查，通过计算Pearson的相关系数。ResultsThe平均参与者的年龄为50.3岁，74（63.8%）是男性。平均每周工作和休息时间分别为41.6和12.1小时。验证性因素分析支持原双因素模型。两个分量表的内部一致性（Cronbach's alpha >0.90）和重测信度（加权κ得分>0.45）都很高。收敛和判别效度是可以接受的两个分量表（CIW和WIC）。ConclusionsThis study confirmed the useful of the CIWS within a Japanese context. J-CIWS可能有助于评估就业家庭照顾者之间的工作和照顾之间的冲突程度。Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21：254-261。
AimThis study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Caregiving Interface Work Scale (J‐CIWS) for use with employed Japanese family caregivers.MethodsPermission was obtained from the developer of the original CIWS. The CIWS contains 20 items: 10 measuring care interface work (CIW) and 10 measuring work interface care (WIC). Responses are measured on a five‐point Likert scale. The J‐CIWS was developed through forward‐ and back‐translation and cognitive interviews of employed family caregivers. An internet survey was conducted with 116 employed family caregivers, and 78 participants answered a retest. Questionnaire items included the J‐CIWS and demographic factors. Factor analysis was conducted to determine the J‐CIWS factor structure. Validity was assessed based on known‐groups, convergent and discriminant validity. Internal consistency was examined by calculating Cronbach's α. Test–retest reliability was examined by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient.ResultsThe mean participant age was 50.3 years; 74 (63.8%) were male. The average weekly working and caregiving hours were 41.6 and 12.1 h, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original two‐factor model. High internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha >0.90) and sufficient test–retest reliability (weighted κ score >0.45) were demonstrated for both subscales. Convergent and discriminant validity were acceptable for the two subscales (CIW and WIC).ConclusionsThis study confirmed the usefulness of the CIWS within a Japanese context. The J‐CIWS may be useful for evaluating the extent of the conflict between work and care among employed family caregivers.Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 254–261.