Quantification of Nursery Habitats for Blue Crabs in Chesapeake Bay
Quantification of Nursery Habitats for Blue Crabs in Chesapeake Bay
复制标题
切萨皮克湾蓝蟹栖息地的量化
DOI:
10.25773/v5-237q-gc83
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
Gina M. Ralph
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gina M. Ralph
The blue crab is an iconic species in Chesapeake Bay, supporting important commercial and recreational fisheries and functioning as a critical link in the food web. Structurally complex habitats are often cited as nurseries for the blue crab, and other commercially important fish and crustacean species, by providing enhanced growth and survival for juveniles. I quantified the value of shallow habitats as nurseries for blue crabs through field studies and a demographic model. In Chapter 2 ,1 utilized a two-year juvenile survey in vegetated habitats of the lower Bay to examine the effect of habitat complexity on the density of juvenile blue crabs. The functional relationship between seagrass cover and juvenile density was exponential, such that there were proportionally more crabs per unit increase in cover of vegetated habitat at high percent cover than at low percent cover. The relationship varied spatially, with higher densities on the eastern shore, and between the two years. The high spatial and annual variability led to questions about how habitat utilization varied throughout the recruitment season. I addressed the timing of recruitment and migration between habitats in Chapter 3 through the development of a survey of shallow habitats in the York River with high temporal and spatial resolution. The study provided evidence for a carrying capacity of juvenile blue crabs in vegetated habitats at 10-15 crabs m2.1 found substantially higher densities of small juveniles in shallow unvegetated habitats than previously documented, which suggested that the current paradigm for blue crab recruitment requires modification to include the importance of shallow unvegetated habitats for small juveniles. In Chapter 4, I examined the effect of habitat utilization patterns as a function of age or ontogeny on the blue crab stock assessment by comparing juvenile density and abundance estimates from shallow vegetated and unvegetated habitats to estimates from deep habitats sampled by the primary survey for the stock assessment. Juvenile abundance was very high in both shallow habitats despite the relatively smaller area, thus suggesting that the winter dredge survey substantially underestimated the abundance of juvenile crabs. If this bias is inconsistent inter-annually, potentially as a function of temperature, then stock assessments may be producing biased reference points. Finally, I developed an exploratory habitat-specific demographic model to quantify the effects of habitat on population fitness in Chapter 5. Under all fishing mortality rates, including a complete fishing moratorium, the population growth rate was less than 1 when only unvegetated habitat was present; the increased survival of age-0 crabs provided by vegetated habitats led to increases in the population growth rates. The vegetated habitats provided a buffer from fishing mortality; that is, as the survival of juveniles increased in vegetated habitats, the population could sustain higher fishing mortality rates while still remaining stable or even increasing. Shallow vegetated habitats substantially influence juvenile blue crabs and the overall population growth rate. It is essential that these habitats be considered in future explorations of the dynamics of blue crabs, as well as other species that exhibit ontogenetic shifts in habitat utilization. AUTHOR’S NOTE The chapters of this dissertation were written in manuscript format for scientific publication. Thus, each chapter is written in the third person to represent my co-authors, and is formatted to align with the guidelines of the publication to which the manuscript was or will be submitted. At the time of writing, citations for individual chapters are as follows: CHAPTER 2 Ralph, G.M., Seitz, R.D., Orth, R.J., Knick, K.E., and Lipcius, R.N. 2013. Broad-scale association between seagrass cover and juvenile blue crab density in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 488:51-63. [Contribution number 3278 of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, The College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062] CHAPTER 3 Ralph, G.M., Seebo, M.S., and Lipcius, R.N. In prep. Spatiotemporal patterns in juvenile blue crab recruitment to seagrass and unvegetated nursery habitats. CHAPTER 4 Ralph, G.M., and Lipcius, R.N. Accepted. Critical habitats and stock assessment: agespecific bias in the Chesapeake Bay blue crab population survey. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. CHAPTER 5 Ralph, G.M., Miller, T.J., and Lipcius, R.N. In prep. Quantifying the role of nursery habitats for the Chesapeake Bay blue crab using population fitness. Quantification of Nursery Habitats for Blue Crabs in Chesapeake Bay CHAPTER 1 The Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab: Life History and Habitat Utilization