Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test.
Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test.
复制标题
全酸蚀和自酸蚀牙本质粘合剂系统在周边和中央牙本质组织上的粘合强度：微拉伸粘合强度测试。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Bulucu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Yeşilyurt;B. Bulucu
目的
本研究的目的是通过将四种全酸蚀粘合剂[Excite（EB）、Prime&Bond NT（PBNT）、Single Bond（SB）和One Coat Bond（OCB）]与五种自酸蚀粘合剂进行比较来评估它们的微拉伸粘合强度（mu TBS（Clearfil SE Bond（CSEB）、Xeno III（X III）、Prompt L-Pop（PLP）、AQ Bond（AQB）和Tyrian/One Step plus（TOSP））。此外，使用扫描电子显微镜（SEM）检查粘结树脂与牙本质之间的界面。
方法和材料
暴露离体人磨牙的表面咬合牙本质，并使用湿800粒度碳化硅纸进行修整。然后根据制造商的说明书用上述粘合剂将复合树脂块粘合到磨牙样品上。在37 ℃的水中24小时后，将样本切成1 mm厚的切片，并根据它们与牙髓组织的关系使用视觉标准分为两个区域亚组：牙髓中心和牙髓周边。然后将切片修剪用于微拉伸粘合测试，并进行拉伸力和1 mm/min的十字头速度。进行双向方差分析进行统计分析。此外，使用Post-Hoc测试比较了9种粘合剂系统在每个牙本质区域的粘结强度。在扫描电镜下观察各粘接系统的树脂-牙本质界面。
结果
平均mu TBS范围从TOSP的（25.2 MPa）到PBNT的（48.9 MPa）。除CSEB外，全酸蚀粘接系统的粘接强度无显著差异，均高于自酸蚀粘接系统（p<0.05）。所有9种粘合剂系统均未观察到显著的区域差异（p>0.05）。扫描电镜观察表明，胶粘剂体系没有标准的杂化。
结论
不同的牙本质区域可能不会表现出对使用新的粘合剂系统的粘结强度的大的影响。
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of four total-etch adhesives [Excite (EB), Prime&Bond NT (PBNT), Single Bond (SB), and One Coat Bond (OCB)] by comparing them to five self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB), Xeno III (X III), Prompt L-Pop (PLP), AQ Bond (AQB), and Tyrian/One Step plus (TOSP)] at different dentinal areas. In addition the interface between the adhesive resins and dentin was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Superficial occlusal dentin of extracted human molars was exposed and finished with wet 800-grit silicon carbide paper. A block of composite resin was then bonded to the molar samples with the above adhesives according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours in water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were sectioned into 1 mm thick slices and divided into two regional subgroups according to their relationship to pulp tissue using visual criteria: pulp center and pulp periphery. The slices were then trimmed for the microtensile bond test and subjected to a tensile force and crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical analyses. In addition the bond strengths for nine adhesive systems for each dentinal area were compared using the Post-Hoc test. The resin-dentin interfaces for each adhesive system were observed under a SEM.
RESULTS
Mean mu TBS ranged from (25.2 MPa) for TOSP to (48.9 MPa) for PBNT. The bond strengths of total-etch adhesive systems were not significantly different, and were higher than self-etch adhesive systems, except for CSEB (p<0.05). No significant regional difference was observed for all of the nine adhesive systems (p>0.05). SEM observation showed there is not a standard hybridization for adhesive systems.
CONCLUSION
Different dentinal areas may not exhibit as great an influence on bond strengths using new adhesive systems.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5
作者：
SANO, H;SHONO, T;PASHLEY, DH
通讯作者：
PASHLEY, DH
影响因子：
5
作者：
Armstrong, SR;Boyer, DB;Keller, JC
通讯作者：
Keller, JC
影响因子：
5
作者：
JACOBSEN, T;SODERHOLM, KJ
通讯作者：
SODERHOLM, KJ
影响因子：
5
作者：
Watanabe, LG;Marshall, GW;Marshall, SJ
通讯作者：
Marshall, SJ
体外与 II 类蛀牙牙本质壁的粘合特性。
DOI：
10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00089-0
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bouillaguet,S;Ciucchi,B;Jacoby,T;Wataha,JC;Pashley,D
通讯作者：
Pashley,D