Versions of Vocationalism: an analysis of some social and political influences on curriculum policy and practice
Versions of Vocationalism: an analysis of some social and political influences on curriculum policy and practice
复制标题
职业主义的不同版本：对课程政策和实践的一些社会和政治影响的分析
DOI：
10.1080/0142569890100206
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
I. Bates
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
I. Bates
摘要本文报告了一个案例研究，它检验和发展了进一步的理论，这些理论试图解释形成课程定义的社会和政治过程。它的基础是对职业教育史上一个关键阶段的研究。与其他对课程定义过程的研究不同，所涉及的因素是随着时间的推移和在若干操作层面上进行的探索。例如，在这些不同的层面上，职业教育先后被去职业化、激进化、去职业化和废职化。通过对材料的比较分析，建立了一个模型，该模型有助于解释这些截然不同的职业主义版本的发展，借鉴了互动主义和新马克思主义的观点。
Abstract This paper reports a case study which tests and develops further theories which seek to explain the social and political processes which shape curricular definitions. It is grounded in research into a critical phase in the history of careers education. In contrast with other studies of the process of defining curricula, the factors involved are explored both over time and at a number of levels of operationalisation. At these various levels careers education was, for example, successively devocationalised, radicalised, devocationalised and revocationalised. Through comparative analysis of the material, a model is developed which helps to explain the development of these distinctly different versions of vocationalism, drawing on both interactionist and neo‐Marxist perspectives.