A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems
复制标题
论证系统中不同支持方法的调查
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Guillermo R. Simari
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andrea Cohen;Sebastian Gottifredi;A. García;Guillermo R. Simari
摘要在过去的几十年里，大多数文献都致力于研究论证形式主义，重点是论点之间的失败关系。近年来，支持关系的研究重新引起了研究者的注意，大部分的研究一直集中在研究支持的背景下，抽象的论证，考虑支持作为一个明确的相互作用之间的论点。然而，在不同的环境中，还有其他考虑到支助的办法。本文综述了文献中对支持概念的几种解释，如演绎支持、必要支持、证据支持、次论元和支持等。其目的是提供一个全面的研究，这些解释之间的相似之处和差异突出，以及讨论如何解决不同的论证形式主义。
Abstract In the last decades, most works in the literature have been devoted to study argumentation formalisms that focus on a defeat relation among arguments. Recently, the study of a support relation between arguments regained attention among researchers; the bulk of the research has been centered on the study of support within the context of abstract argumentation by considering support as an explicit interaction between arguments. However, there exist other approaches that take support into account in a different setting. This article surveys several interpretations of the notion of support as proposed in the literature, such as deductive support, necessary support, evidential support, subargument, and backing, among others. The aim is to provide a comprehensive study where similarities and differences among these interpretations are highlighted, as well as discuss how they are addressed by different argumentation formalisms.