Plasma formation and temperature measurement during single-bubble cavitation

Plasma formation and temperature measurement during single-bubble cavitation
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/nature03361
复制
发表时间:
2005-03-03
期刊:
影响因子:
64.8
通讯作者:
Suslick, KS
Suslick, KS
中科院分区:
综合性期刊1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Flannigan, DJ;Suslick, KS

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

单气泡声致发光(SBSL 1 -5)是由气泡压缩过程中达到的极端温度和压力引起的;计算预测(6,7)存在热的、光学不透明的等离子体核(8),随之产生韧致辐射(9,10)。最近有争议的报告(11,12)声称在声空化(11,12)期间观察到来自氘-氘聚变的中子。然而,以前一直没有强有力的实验证据,在单泡或多泡声致发光的等离子体的存在。SBSL通常产生无特征的发射光谱(13),其很少揭示腔内物理条件或化学过程。在这里,我们报告的原子(Ar)发射和广泛的分子(SO)和离子(O-2(+))的进展SBSL光谱从浓H2SO 4水溶液的观察。Ar和SO发射都允许光谱温度测定,如用其他发射体(14-16)实现的多泡声致发光。从Ar和O-2(+)中观察到的发射激发态与任何热过程都不一致。所涉及的Ar激发态具有极高的能量(> 13 eV),并且在测量的Ar发射温度(4,000 - 15,000 K)下不能热填充; O-2的电离能是其键离解能的两倍以上,因此O-2(+)同样不能热产生。因此,我们的结论是,这些发射物种必须起源于碰撞高能电子,离子或粒子从热等离子体核心。
Single-bubble sonoluminescence (SBSL1-5) results from the extreme temperatures and pressures achieved during bubble compression; calculations have predicted(6,7) the existence of a hot, optically opaque plasma core(8) with consequent bremsstrahlung radiation(9,10). Recent controversial reports(11,12) claim the observation of neutrons from deuterium - deuterium fusion during acoustic cavitation(11,12.) However, there has been previously no strong experimental evidence for the existence of a plasma during single- or multi-bubble sonoluminescence. SBSL typically produces featureless emission spectra(13) that reveal little about the intra-cavity physical conditions or chemical processes. Here we report observations of atomic (Ar) emission and extensive molecular (SO) and ionic (O-2(+)) progressions in SBSL spectra from concentrated aqueous H2SO4 solutions. Both the Ar and SO emission permit spectroscopic temperature determinations, as accomplished for multi-bubble sonoluminescence with other emitters(14-16). The emissive excited states observed from both Ar and O-2(+) are inconsistent with any thermal process. The Ar excited states involved are extremely high in energy (> 13 eV) and cannot be thermally populated at the measured Ar emission temperatures (4,000 - 15,000 K); the ionization energy of O-2 is more than twice its bond dissociation energy, so O-2(+) likewise cannot be thermally produced. We therefore conclude that these emitting species must originate from collisions with high-energy electrons, ions or particles from a hot plasma core.