Beyond choice architecture: a building code for structuring climate risk management decisions
Beyond choice architecture: a building code for structuring climate risk management decisions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/bpp.2020.37
复制
发表时间：
2021-10-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gregory, Robin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Arvai, Joseph;Gregory, Robin
尽管采取紧急气候变化行动的必要性是明确的，但关于如何做出更好的气候风险管理决策的见解有限。虽然行为研究者的注意力主要集中在选择架构上，但我们认为，许多应对气候风险的背景需要更多地关注审慎和动态选择环境的需求。这类决策的一个关键方面是决策者和利益攸关方需要确定和平衡相互冲突的经济、社会和环境目标。这种对困难的、针对具体情况的权衡取舍的认识突出表明，有必要对决策过程进行结构调整，以便明确阐述各项目标并确定其优先次序。同样，政策分析和审议必须将优先事项与气候风险管理备选办法有效联系起来。这种气候变化决策的重组需要的不仅仅是推动。必须调整科学和技术工作的方向，帮助利益攸关方和决策者更好地了解气候变化管理替代办法的各种影响，并更好地准备采取与问题的紧迫性相称的行动。
Although the need for urgent climate change action is clear, insights about how to make better climate risk management decisions are limited. While significant attention from behavioral researchers has focused on choice architecture, we argue that many of the contexts for addressing climate risks require increased attention to the needs of a deliberative and dynamic choice environment. A key facet of this kind of decision is the need for decision-makers and stakeholders to identify and balance conflicting economic, social and environmental objectives. This recognition of difficult, context-specific trade-offs highlights the need for structuring the decision-making process so that objectives are clearly articulated and prioritized. Equally, policy analyses and deliberations must effectively link priorities with climate risk management options. This restructuring of decision-making about climate change calls for more than a nudge. Scientific and technical efforts must be redirected to help stakeholders and decision-makers better understand the diverse implications of climate change management alternatives and to become better equipped to take actions commensurate with the urgency of the problem.