Criteria for clinical translucency evaluation of direct esthetic restorative materials.
Criteria for clinical translucency evaluation of direct esthetic restorative materials.
复制标题
DOI：
10.5395/rde.2016.41.3.159
复制
发表时间：
2016-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lee, Yong-Keun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lee, Yong-Keun
本综述的目的是为直接美学修复材料的临床粘附性评价提出实用标准，并根据这些标准对粘附性进行评价。为了评价报告的透明度值，应仔细检查测量仪器和方法、样品厚度、背景颜色和照明。半透明参数（TP）为15 ~ 19可视为1 mm厚人牙釉质的半透明性。0.07的对比度半透明差异的视觉感知阈值（DeltaCR）可以转换为DeltaTP值2。直接和间接树脂复合材料之间的半透明性差异是可感知的（DeltaTP > 2）。通用和相应的可流动树脂复合材料在大多数产品中没有表现出可感知的透明度差异。半透明性在每个色度组内的产品之间以及在每个产品内的色度组之间存在显著差异。人牙釉质的半透明性和半透明性差异的感觉阈值可作为临床评价美学修复材料半透明性的标准。
The purpose of this review was to suggest practical criteria for the clinical translucency evaluation of direct esthetic restorative materials, and to review the translucency with these criteria. For the evaluation of reported translucency values, measuring instrument and method, specimen thickness, background color, and illumination should be scrutinized. Translucency parameter (TP) of 15 to 19 could be regarded as the translucency of 1 mm thick human enamel. Visual perceptibility threshold for translucency difference in contrast ratio (DeltaCR) of 0.07 could be transformed into DeltaTP value of 2. Translucency differences between direct and indirect resin composites were perceivable (DeltaTP > 2). Universal and corresponding flowable resin composites did not show perceivable translucency differences in most products. Translucency differed significantly by the product within each shade group, and by the shade group within each product. Translucency of human enamel and perceptibility threshold for translucency difference may be used as criteria for the clinical evaluation of translucency of esthetic restorative materials.