Carbohydrate and fluid intake affect the saliva flow rate and IgA response to cycling

Carbohydrate and fluid intake affect the saliva flow rate and IgA response to cycling
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/00005768-200012000-00013
复制
发表时间:
2000-12-01
期刊:
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gleeson, M
Gleeson, M
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bishop, NC;Blannin, AK;Gleeson, M

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:本研究的目的是研究在长时间的周期运动中,常规CHO饮料摄入和限制液体摄入对各种唾液参数的影响。方法:采用随机区组设计,15名娱乐活跃的男性以60%(V)在点O-2 max上骑自行车2小时,三次,间隔1周。在CHO和安慰剂(PLA)治疗中,受试者在运动前(400 mt)、运动中(每15分钟150 mt)和运动后(400 mt)饮用葡萄糖(60 g.L-1)或安慰剂饮料。在限制液体摄入(RFI)治疗中,受试者在运动期间每15分钟根据需要服用总计200 mt的安慰剂液体。在运动前、运动后1、1.5和2小时以及运动后1小时收集定时的非刺激性唾液样本。从8名受试者的亚组中采集运动前、运动后和运动后1 h的血液样本。结果如下:PLA和RFI处理组运动后血糖水平分别比CHO处理组低18%和20%(P < 0.01)。在运动1.5 h和2 h时,CHO治疗组的唾液流速显著高于RFI治疗组(分别为P < 0.01和P < 0.05)。CHO治疗组唾液伊加(s-IgA)浓度在整个运动过程中均显著低于RFI治疗组(P < 0.05)。治疗组之间的唾液流速或s-IgA浓度均无其他差异。s-IgA分泌率、α-淀粉酶活性和α-淀粉酶分泌率均不受给药影响。结论:这些研究结果表明,CHO和液体摄入量的影响s-IgA和唾液流速反应,以延长亚极量运动。
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of regular CHO beverage ingestion and restricted fluid intake on various salivary parameters during prolonged cycle exercise. Methods: In a randomized block design, 15 recreationally active men cycled for 2 h at 60% (V) over dot O-2max on three occasions, separated by 1 wk. On the CHO and placebo (PLA) treatments, subjects consumed either a glucose (60 g.L-1) or placebo drink before (400 mt), during (150 mt every 15 min), and after (400 mt) the exercise. On the restricted fluid intake (RFI) treatment subjects were given a total of 200 mt of placebo fluid to take as desired every 15-min during the exercise. Timed, unstimulated saliva samples were collected preexercise, at 1, 1.5, and 2 h of exercise and at 1 h postexercise. Blood samples were obtained from a subset of 8 subjects preexercise, postexercise, and at 1 h postexercise. Results: Postexercise plasma glucose levels were 18% and 20% lower on the PLA and RFI treatments, respectively, compared with the CHO treatment (P < 0.01). Saliva flow rates were significantly higher on the CHO treatment compared with the RFI treatment at 1.5 h and 2 h of exercise (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Salivary IgA (s-IgA) concentration was significantly lower on the CHO treatment compared with the RFI treatment throughout the exercise (P < 0.05). No other differences were seen between treatments for either saliva flow rate or s-IgA concentration. Neither s-IgA secretion rate, alpha -amylase activity, nor alpha -amylase secretion rate were affected by treatment. Conclusions: These findings suggest that CHO and fluid intake influence the s-IgA and saliva flow rate response to prolonged submaximal exercise.