The International Social Survey Program Modules on Religion, 1991–2018
The International Social Survey Program Modules on Religion, 1991–2018
复制标题
国际社会调查计划宗教模块，1991-2018
DOI：
10.1080/00207659.2021.1976471
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
B. Schapiro
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tom W. Smith;B. Schapiro
这是国际社会调查计划（ISSP）宗教调查特刊的介绍。以前的特刊涵盖了ISSP关于“公民身份”（Scholz et al. 2017; Eder 2017），“工作方向”（Jutz et al. 2018; Volk and Hadler 2018），“政府角色”（Edlund and Lindh 2019; Hadler et al. 2019）和“社交网络”（Sapin et al. 2020; Hadler et al. 2020）的调查。这期特刊的四篇实质性文章涵盖了世界各地有关宗教的广泛重要问题。Hoellinger和Lorenz（2021）研究了宗教文化中宗教虔诚的水平和性质。他们的比较包括三个方面：认同和属于一个宗教，公共和私人的宗教行为，宗教信仰。他们发现，在不同国家和宗教文化中，宗教信仰的模式和水平存在很大的跨文化差异。标准的世俗化理论并不适用于不同的宗教文化。Dimova和Dimov（2021）从比较的角度研究了宗教与种族之间的联系。他们发现少数民族的宗教行为和信仰水平高于主导民族。此外，他们发现，“宗教是种族的关键标志之一”，但不能简单地用一个代替另一个。Babunashvili和Kipiani（2021）研究了宗教和对同性关系的自由态度之间的联系，以及前共产主义国家和其他国家之间的差异。他们观察到，对性少数群体的自由主义观点随着宗教信仰的上升而减少，独立于宗教信仰的后共产主义国家对同性恋的接受程度低于其他国家，而在后共产主义国家，宗教对同性恋的影响也低于其他国家。Ladini et al.（2021）在意大利进行了一项关于宗教信仰与移民态度之间关系的案例研究。他们的分析显示，经常参加宗教仪式的非宗教人士和天主教徒对移民最有利，而不定期或从不参加教堂仪式的天主教徒最不赞成移民。ISSP是从以前的一般社会调查发展而来的。它的起源是国家民意研究所各自国家研究之间的双边合作
This is an introduction to the special issue on the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) religion survey. Previous special issues covered the ISSP surveys on “citizenship” (Scholz et al. 2017; Eder 2017), “work orientations” (Jutz et al. 2018; Volk and Hadler 2018), “role of government” (Edlund and Lindh 2019; Hadler et al. 2019), and “social networks” (Sapin et al. 2020; Hadler et al. 2020). The four substantive articles in this special issue cover a wide range of important issues about religion around the world. Hoellinger and Lorenz (2021) examine the level and nature of religiosity across religious cultures. Their comparison covered three aspects: identifying with and belonging to a religion, public and private religious behaviors, and religious beliefs. They found large cross-cultural variation in both the pattern and level of religiosity across nations and religious cultures. Standard secularization theory does not apply uniformly across different religious cultures. Dimova and Dimov (2021) study the connection between religion and ethnicity in comparative perspective. They found that ethnic minorities had higher levels of religious behaviors and beliefs than the dominant national groups. Also, they discovered that “religion is among the key markers of ethnicity” but one cannot be simply substituted for the other. Babunashvili and Kipiani (2021) look at the connection between religion and liberal attitudes toward same-sex relationships and how it differs between former-Communist countries and other countries. They observed that liberal views toward sexual minorities decrease as religiousness rises, that independent of religiousness post-Communist countries are less accepting of homosexuality than those in other countries, and that in postCommunist countries religion has less impact on views about homosexuality than it does in other countries. Ladini et al. (2021) conduct a case study in Italy of the relationship of religiosity and attitudes toward immigration. Their analysis showed that the non-religious and Catholics frequently attending religious services were the most favorable toward immigration, while Catholics who irregularly or never attended church services were the least in favor of immigration. The ISSP evolved out of preexisting general social surveys. Its origin was a bilateral collaboration between the respective national studies of the National Opinion Research
社会研究与宗教研究
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
Religion and Society 11
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kawabata;Akira;Manabe;Kazufumi;Kawamata;Toshinori;and Watanabe;Mitsuharu
通讯作者：
Mitsuharu