Research Design Options for Intervention Studies.
Research Design Options for Intervention Studies.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/pep.0000000000000380
复制
发表时间：
2017-07
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Corrigan JD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lobo MA;Kagan SH;Corrigan JD
目的：回顾康复研究设计。要点总结：单病例、观察性和定性设计在最近的进展和回答有关康复的重要科学问题的能力方面得到了强调。结论声明：单病例、观察性和定性设计可以以系统和严格的方式进行，提供使用更常见的设计（如随机对照试验）无法获得的重要信息。这些不太常用的设计可能更可行和有效地回答许多研究问题，在该领域的rehabilitation.Recommendations临床实践：研究人员应该考虑这些设计时，选择最佳的设计来回答他们的研究问题。我们应该改善现有研究设计的利弊教育，以便对我们阅读和审查的科学文献进行更批判性的分析，避免低估不在更常用类别内的研究。
Purpose:To review research designs for rehabilitation.Summary of Key Points:Single-case, observational, and qualitative designs are highlighted in terms of recent advances and ability to answer important scientific questions about rehabilitation.Statement of Conclusions:Single-case, observational, and qualitative designs can be conducted in a systematic and rigorous manner that provides important information that cannot be acquired using more common designs, such as randomized controlled trials. These less commonly used designs may be more feasible and effective in answering many research questions in the field of rehabilitation.Recommendations for Clinical Practice:Researchers should consider these designs when selecting the optimal design to answer their research questions. We should improve education about the advantages and disadvantages of existing research designs to enable more critical analysis of the scientific literature we read and review to avoid undervaluing studies not within more commonly used categories.