Editorial: Swan song
Editorial: Swan song
复制标题
社论:《天鹅之歌》
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Davis
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Davis
This is my last editorial. I’ve been writing editorials for this journal since I became coeditor with Mary Evans in 2003, so it seems appropriate to make this something of a swan song. A swan song as an ode to the pleasures, but also the responsibilities of contributing to an academic journal through the venerable and, in my opinion, often underrated, institution of The Editorial. Many of you have probably found yourselves routinely skipping over the editorial part of the journals you read because you expect them to be boring and, as obligatory, pro forma introductions to the articles in the current issue, not offering much of interest. As the editors of the European Journal of Women’s Studies, we have made an effort to change this. We wanted our editorials to do some work for our journal: to be a vehicle for expressing our vision as editors on what is going on in the field of gender studies, to address the current dilemmas of doing research in the academy, and to comment on relevant social and political developments. We also wanted the editorials to provide a space for us to give vent to our personal concerns – something one former editor referred to as ‘having a good moan’. In this way, we hoped to provoke our readers into thinking about issues we believed were important and to spark discussion and debate. Writing editorials is like no other kind of writing. It can be spontaneous and relatively painless, yet also harrowing and sometimes even scary. Let me explain what writing an editorial has meant for me. The managing editor would gently remind me that my turn had come. Panic would invariably set in as I never seemed to have a topic ready beforehand. I would spend a few days of mulling and stewing and then – suddenly – there it was: the topic, the idea, the thing I absolutely knew I had to write about. There is nothing like an editorial for being allowed to make a case for something you feel passionate about. No holds barred, no beating around the bush. Strong statements, preferably in the first person, argumentative discourse without footnotes or references, and everything having to be said in 2000 words or less. It can be exhilarating and even liberating to write that way, but also frightening, because there is your most heart-felt rant, out in the world – as the Dutch say, with a bared bum – for people to see, to like, dislike, agree or disagree with, to applaud or attack. What did I feel passionate about in the last decade and a half? In which directions did I hope to see the field of gender studies move? To answer these questions, I reread my editorials – all 21 of them. It was a trip down memory lane. I had forgotten many of the issues that had so angered me in the past (sometimes something as incidental as an art exhibition in Amsterdam or a random comment at a gender studies conference). But many of them, surprisingly, resonated with my present concerns. Rereading my editorial rants, I discovered three issues that continue to bother me: the lack of a transnational 691724 EJW0010.1177/1350506817691724European Journal of Women’s StudiesEditorial research-article2017