History Writing and Constructions of National Space: The Long Dominance of the National in Modern European Historiographies
History Writing and Constructions of National Space: The Long Dominance of the National in Modern European Historiographies
复制标题
历史书写与国家空间建构：现代欧洲史学中民族的长期统治
DOI：
10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_2
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Berger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Berger
在本章中，伯杰概述了历史学科从十八世纪开始到二十一世纪的发展。他强调民族史在史学中的意义和发展，因为民族史从此成为历史书写的主导形式。此外，作者追溯了历史学科的制度演变。欧洲各地的学院以及哥廷根或柏林的大学一直是该学科专业化的重要场所。虽然民族历史的现代书写始于启蒙运动和浪漫主义时期，并随着历史的发展而发展，但伯杰指出的当前两个主要趋势是，一方面是历史的再民族化，另一方面是民族史学的批判形式。
In this chapter Berger presents an overview of the development of the historical discipline from its beginnings in the eighteenth century up to the twenty-first century. He emphasises the significance and development of national histories in the historiography, because this has been the dominant form of history writing ever since. Moreover, the author traces the institutional evolutions of the historical discipline. Academies around Europe and universities in Göttingen or Berlin had been important places for the professionalisation of this discipline. While the modern writing of national histories began during the Enlightenment and Romanticism and developed through history, two current major trends indicated by Berger are on one hand the renationalization of history and on the other hand the critical forms of national historiography.