Extraction out of NP in French
Extraction out of NP in French
复制标题
从法语中的 NP 中提取
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1992
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Godard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Godard
可以从NP中提取的补语和不可以从NP中提取的补语之间的区别通常被认为是来自于结构约束（如相邻性）和特定补语的句法属性的相互作用。我在这里表明，可提取的补语并不具有将它们与不可提取的补语区分开来的句法属性;事实上，它们的句法异质性使得很难提出一个结构性的解释。我的论点是，所有可提取的补语都是NP中的第一个论元，而不可提取的补语要么是非论元，要么不是第一个论元。为了说明这一点，我将详细探讨NP的论元结构，并提出有关谓词论元结构的建议。我认为，特别是两个类的N之间的区别，那些指定的语法属性为他们的参数和那些离开他们未指定的，我建议，不仅存在词汇关系，但也外在的关系。
The distinction between complements which may be extracted out of NP and complements which may not is generally assumed to follow from the interaction of structural constraints such as Subjacency and the syntactic properties of the particular complements. I show here that extractable complements do not share a syntactic property which distinguishes them from non-extractable ones; in fact, their syntactic heterogeneity renders it difficult to propose a structural account at all. It is my contention that all extractable complements are the first argument in the NP, while non-extractable ones are either non-arguments or not the first argument. In order to show this, I explore the argument structure of NP in some detail, and will make proposals concerning predicate argument structures. I argue in particular for the distinction between two classes of N, those which specify syntactic properties for their arguments and those which leave them unspecified, and I propose that there exist not only lexical relations but also extrinsic relations.