Commentary on Scaling-Up Evidence-Based Interventions in Public Systems.
Commentary on Scaling-Up Evidence-Based Interventions in Public Systems.
复制标题
关于扩大公共系统循证干预措施的评论。
DOI：
10.1007/s11121-019-01059-5
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
DeRosier,MelissaE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Weaver,Cynthia;DeRosier,MelissaE
本评论回顾了预防研究协会 (SPR) 预防科学进步图谱 (MAPS) IV 工作组的调查结果和建议，如 Fagan 等人的文章中详细介绍的。 （预防科学，2019）。除了强调与之前的 MAPS II 工作组调查结果的相似性和差异外，讨论还重点关注四项扩展建议：关注公平实施作为社区采用循证干预 (EBI) 途径的重要性、将数据监测和评估能力概念化扩大到 EBI 特定数据之外的价值、更精确地指导公共系统 EBI 转介的机会，以及 EBI 开发者和供应商使用可操作的结构主动、有意识地实施保真度测量的重要性。
This commentary reviews the findings and recommendations from the Society for Prevention Research (SPR) Mapping Advances in Prevention Science (MAPS) IV Task Force as detailed in the article by Fagan et al. (Prevention Science, 2019). In addition to highlighting similarities and differences with the prior MAPS II Task Force findings, discussion focuses on four extension recommendations: the importance of attending to equitable implementation as a pathway to evidence-based intervention (EBI) uptake by communities, the value of broadening conceptualization of data monitoring and evaluation capacity beyond EBI-specific data, the opportunity to more precisely guide EBI-referrals from public systems, and the importance of EBI developers and purveyors proactively and deliberately operationalizing fidelity measurement using actionable constructs.