Exclusion in Area-based Urban Policy Programmes
Exclusion in Area-based Urban Policy Programmes
复制标题
排除在基于区域的城市政策计划中
DOI：
10.1080/09654310902949646
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
J. Larsen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Annika Agger;J. Larsen
基于区域的城市更新项目，如英国的“社区新政”、德国的Soziale Stadt和丹麦的Kvarterloft，都是基于参与式方法，强调公民的积极参与和当地利益相关者的参与。本文认为，这些倡议并不像他们努力做到的那样开放和包容，在本文中，我们探讨了在实施这些计划时可能发生的不同类型的排斥。基于理论文献和丹麦Kvarterloft项目的经验数据，我们确定了三种类型的排斥——结构性排斥、话语性排斥和故意排斥——并对这些排斥提供了理论分析和实证解释。文章的结论是，从业者和政治家需要批判性地反思不同类型的排斥，以创造透明和包容的民主进程。
Area-based urban regeneration programmes such as the New Deal for Communities in the UK, the German Soziale Stadt and the Danish Kvarterloft are based on a participatory approach emphasizing active citizen participation and the involvement of local stakeholders. The article argues that these initiatives are not as open and inclusive as they strive to be, and in this article, we explore the different types of exclusion that can take place when such programmes are implemented. Based on the theoretical literature and on empirical data from the Danish Kvarterloft project, we identify three types of exclusion—structural, discursive and deliberate exclusion—and offer a theoretical analysis and an empirical account of these exclusions. The article concludes that practitioners as well as politicians need to reflect critically on different types of exclusion in order to create transparent and inclusive democratic processes.