Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation
Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/xeb.0000000000000062
复制
发表时间：
2015-09-01
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Porritt, Kylie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lockwood, Craig;Munn, Zachary;Porritt, Kylie
定性综合告知循证医疗保健的重要方面，特别是在卫生专业人员工作的实际决策环境中。在可用于综合的定性方法中，元聚合最透明地符合进行高质量系统审查的公认惯例。元聚合的哲学基础是实用主义和先验现象学。荟萃综述的基本特征是审稿人避免重新解释纳入的研究，而是按照原作者的意图准确可靠地呈现纳入的研究结果。本研究通过概述系统审查报告的基本组成部分，报告了在先验协议和标准化结果报告框架结构内的元聚合方法和方法。
Qualitative synthesis informs important aspects of evidence-based healthcare, particularly within the practical decision-making contexts that health professionals work in. Of the qualitative methodologies available for synthesis, meta-aggregation is most transparently aligned with accepted conventions for the conduct of high-quality systematic reviews. Meta-aggregation is philosophically grounded in pragmatism and transcendental phenomenology. The essential characteristics of a meta-aggregative review are that the reviewer avoids re-interpretation of included studies, but instead accurately and reliably presents the findings of the included studies as intended by the original authors. This study reports on the methodology and methods of meta-aggregation within the structure of an a priori protocol and standardized frameworks for reporting of results by over-viewing the essential components of a systematic review report.