Voting Technologies, Recount Methods and Votes in Wisconsin and Michigan in 2016
Voting Technologies, Recount Methods and Votes in Wisconsin and Michigan in 2016
复制标题
2016 年威斯康星州和密歇根州的投票技术、重新计票方法和选票
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Matthew Bernhard
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Mebane;Matthew Bernhard
我们提供了2016年在威斯康星州和密歇根州进行的总统选举重新计票的数据，以及有关那里使用的投票技术的信息，以解释为什么很难证明投票技术对候选人特朗普和克林顿是对称的。不清楚使用了哪种技术来记录选票，原始和重新计票的选票总数之间的差异很小，但很少，与选民有关的特征，技术和重新计票方法，以及选择性问题都是障碍。
We present data from the 2016 presidential election recounts done in Wisconsin and Michigan and information about the voting technologies that were used there to explain why it is challenging to show that the voting technologies treated candidates Trump and Clinton symmetrically. Lack of clarity about which type of technology was used to record vote counts, a mix of mostly small but sparse large counted differences between original and recounted vote totals, features that relate to voters, technologies and recount methods, and selectivity concerns are among the obstacles.