Homotopy types of algebraic varieties
Homotopy types of algebraic varieties
复制标题
代数簇的同伦类型
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
B. Toën
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Toën
Let k be a field. To any smooth and projective algebraic variety X over k one can associate certain geometric cohomology spaces H ∗ (X), which are finite dimensional verctor spaces over some coefficients field K. For example H et(X, Ql) (the l-adic cohomology of X := X ⊗k k ), H DR(X) (the algebraic de Rham cohomology of X when e.g. k = C), H ∗ cris(X) (the cristalline cohomology of X when k is of positive characteristic) . . . . These geometric cohomology theories H ∗ are the so-called Weil cohomology theories. They encode geometric properties of X, and are not suppose to see the arithmetic properties of the base field k. More precisely, the arithmetic nature of the base field k is not reflected in the spaces H ∗ (X) themselves but rather appears as the existence of natural additional structures on them. For example, H ∗ et(X, Ql) comes equiped with a continuous action of the Galois group Gal(k/k), H DR(X) is endowed with a pure Hodge structure, H ∗ cris(X) has a structure of an F -isocristal over k . . . . The Tannakian formalism tells us furthermore that these additional structures are encoded in an action of a pro-algebraic group1 H on the space H ∗ (X). The group H of course depends on the cohomology theory one chose, and in the example above is the foundamental group of the Tannakian categories of continuous finite dimension l-adic representations of Gal(k/k), of pure Hodge structures, of F -isocristals over k . . . . From these observations one extracts the following general principle.