Distinguishing pathological from constitutional small for gestational age births in population-based studies
Distinguishing pathological from constitutional small for gestational age births in population-based studies
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.09.004
复制
发表时间:
2009-10-01
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Vintzileos, Anthony M.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ananth, Cande V.;Vintzileos, Anthony M.
Background: Small for gestational age (SGA) can occur following a pathological process or may represent constitutionally small fetuses. However, distinguishing these processes is often difficult, especially in large studies, where the term SGA is often used as a proxy for restricted fetal growth. Since biologic variation in fetal size is largely a third trimester phenomenon. we hypothesized that the definition of SGA at term may include a sizeable proportion of constitutionally small fetuses. in contrast, since biologic variation in fetal size is not fully expressed in (early) preterm gestations, it is plausible that SGA in early preterm gestations would comprise a large proportion of growth restricted fetuses.Aim: We compared mortality and morbidity rates between SGA and appropriate for gestational age (AGA) babies.Subjects: A population-based study of over 19 million non-malformed, singleton births (1995-04) in the United States was performed. Gestational age (24-44 weeks) was based on a clinical estimate. SGA and AGA were defined as sex-specific birthweight