Will They or Won’t They?
Will They or Won’t They?
复制标题
他们会还是不会？
DOI：
10.1057/978-1-137-57186-1_8
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Kuch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Kuch
布卢姆的困境是一个共同的困境，在6月17日的漫漫长夜里，在为自己的通奸行为辩护和想方设法恢复婚姻之间，莫莉玩弄着离婚的想法。在《尤利西斯》中赋予她最后的发言权，强调了乔伊斯对现代婚姻性别政治的重要性、法律下新兴的性别平等，以及离婚促进代理权并使女性摆脱被视为财产的耻辱的方式。作为“有罪的一方”，人们可能会认为莫莉不能申请离婚，但有法律的先例可以让律师辩称，她的通奸行为无法被证明，或者布鲁姆参与或纵容了这一行为，或者他剥夺了她的配偶权构成了正当防卫。
Bloom’s is a shared dilemma for during the long night of 17 June, between justifying her adultery and devising ways to restore her marriage, Molly toys with the idea of divorce. Granting her the final voice inUlyssesemphasizes the significance Joyce attributed to the gender politics of modern marriage, the emerging equality of the sexes under the law, and the way divorce fostered agency and freed women from the stigma of being regarded as property. As the “guilty party” it might be thought Molly cannot petition for divorce, yet there are legal precedents for counsel to argue that her adultery cannot be proven, or that Bloom has conduced or connived in it, or that his depriving her of consortium constitutes a justifiable defense.