Measuring Corruption Indicators and Indices
Measuring Corruption Indicators and Indices
复制标题
衡量腐败指标和指数
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Malito
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Malito
对采取更有效的反腐败行动的一贯和迫切的要求推动了更复杂的腐败措施的发展。然而，这些指标的产生很少被视为一种“治理技术”(Davis等人，2012年)，或一种“没有政府的治理”(Rosenau&Chuempiel，1992)。第一节(1)通过侧重于不同类别的指数和指标，审查了现有的主要腐败措施。第二部分(2)特别关注与这些指标有关的主要本体论和方法论批评、限制和陷阱。第三部分(3)比较分析了两个应用最广泛的腐败指标：世界银行的控制腐败指数(CC)和透明国际的腐败感知指数(CPI)。第四部分(4)评价了建立和使用指标所涉及的政策问题，而论文的最后部分(5)总结了这一分析提出的最重要的问题。
The development of more sophisticated corruption measures has been stimulated by consistent and compelling demands for more effective action against corruption. However, the production of these indicators has rarely been addressed as a ‘technique of governance’ (Davis et al., 2012), or an instrument of ‘governance without government’ (Rosenau & Czempiel, 1992). The first section (1) reviews the major existing measures of corruption, by focusing on different categories of indices and indicators. The second part (2) pays particular attention to the major ontological and methodological criticisms, constraints and pitfalls, connected with these indicators. The third part (3) presents a comparative analysis of two of the most widely used indicators of corruption: the World Bank’s Control of Corruption indicator (CC) and Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI). The fourth section (4) evaluates the policy implications embedded in the construction and employment of indicators, while the last part of the paper (5) concludes by summarizing the most important questions raised by this analysis.