Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain).
Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain).
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0181331
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Darwich L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Molina-López RA;Mañosa S;Torres-Riera A;Pomarol M;Darwich L
很少有研究仔细检查野生动物康复中心的野生动物伤亡情况。这些研究对于检测野生物种的威胁和提供有关这些中心治疗的成本效益的客观标准至关重要。释放率被认为是主要的结果指标，但其他参数，如在中心停留的时间和以每欧元和每天释放的动物数量表示的成本效益指数，可以作为康复成本的可靠估计。一项回顾性研究基于1995-2013年Torreferrussa野生动物康复中心（Catalonia, NW Spain）数据库中记录的54772例入院病例，评估了康复实践的发病率、结果和成本效益。其中鸟类232种（n = 48633），哺乳动物37种（n = 3293），爬行动物20种（n = 2705），两栖动物13种（n = 141）。最常见的入院原因是：39.8%的被没收的保护物种（89.4%的雀形目），31.8%的孤儿幼体动物（35.3%的金丝燕，21.7%的日间猛禽和猫头鹰）和17.4%的创伤伤亡（46.7%的猛禽和猫头鹰）。放归比例最高的是圈养没收类[87.4%的雀鸟（中位停留时间：12天）]，其次是孤儿类[78%的猫头鹰（66天），76.5%的日栖猛禽（43天），75.6%的刺猬（49天），52.7%的雨燕（19天）和52%的蝙蝠（55天）]。对于创伤组，46.8%的释放是刺猬（44天）和25.6%的猫头鹰（103天）。在成本效益指数方面，创伤伤亡和传染病的数值较差，分别为1.3和1.4只放生动物/欧元/天，猛禽、涉禽、海鸟和翼翅目放生动物的成本效益指数尤其低。相反，圈养（4.6）和错位（4.1）的指数最好，特别是在两栖类、爬行类和雀形目中。为提高野生动物康复中心的管理效率，应实施成本效益研究，包括放生率、在中心停留时间和成本效益指数。
There are few studies of careful examination of wildlife casualties in Wildlife Rehabilitation Centers. These studies are essential for detecting menaces to wild species and providing objective criteria about cost-benefit of treatments in those centers. The release rate is considered the main outcome indicator, but other parameters such as length of stay at the center and a cost-benefit index expressed as number of released animals per euro and day, could be used as reliable estimators of the rehabilitation costs. A retrospective study based on 54772 admissions recorded from 1995–2013 in the database of the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Torreferrussa (Catalonia, NW Spain) assessed the morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefits of the rehabilitation practices. Three hundred and two species were included: 232 birds (n = 48633), 37 mammals (n = 3293), 20 reptiles (n = 2705) and 13 amphibians (n = 141). The most frequent causes of admission were: 39.8% confiscation of protected species (89.4% passerines), 31.8% orphaned young animals (35.3% swifts, 21.7% diurnal raptors and owls) and 17.4% trauma casualties (46.7% raptors and owls). The highest proportion of releases was found in the captivity confiscation category [87.4% passerines (median time of stay: 12 days)], followed by the orphaned category [78% owls (66 days), 76.5% diurnal birds of prey (43 days), 75.6% hedgehogs (49 days), 52.7% swifts (19 days) and 52% bats (55 days)]. For the trauma group, 46.8% of releases were hedgehogs (44 days) and 25.6% owls (103 days). As regards the cost-benefit index, the trauma casualties and infectious diseases had the worse values with 1.3 and 1.4 released animals/euro/day respectively, and were particularly low in raptors, waders, marine birds and chiroptera. On the contrary, captivity (4.6) and misplacement (4.1) had the best index, particulary in amphibian, reptiles and passerines. Cost-benefit studies including the release rate, the time of stay at the center and the cost-benefit index should be implemented for improving management efficiency of the Wildlife Rehabilitation Centers.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Kelly, Andrew;Scrivens, Robert;Grogan, Adam
通讯作者：
Grogan, Adam
影响因子：
10.1
作者：
Baker, Sandra E.;Cain, Russ;Macdonald, David W.
通讯作者：
Macdonald, David W.
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Crespo Martinez, Jorge;Izquierdo Rosique, Alejandro;Surroca Royo, Martin
通讯作者：
Surroca Royo, Martin
影响因子：
6.4
作者：
Molina-Lopez, Rafael A.;Casal, Jordi;Darwich, Laila
通讯作者：
Darwich, Laila
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Grogan, A.;Kelly, A.
通讯作者：
Kelly, A.