Lectotypification of Notonia grandiflora (Asteraceae: Senecioneae)
Lectotypification of Notonia grandiflora (Asteraceae: Senecioneae)
复制标题
Notonia grandiflora（菊科：千里光）的选型分析
DOI：
10.11646/phytotaxa.441.1.10
复制
发表时间：
2020-04
期刊：
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Ren Chen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wu Xing;Guo Xin-Qiang;Shao Yun-Yun;Ren Chen
Grandiflora Candolle(1833：518)(菊科：千里光属)是印度半岛和泰国北部特有的一种肉质亚灌木(Trimen 1895，Kitamura&Goul1982，Mathur 1995，Vanijajiva et al.2014年)。目前被公认为Kleinia Grand diflora(DC.)拉尼(1983：801)。到目前为止，这个名字还没有被典型化，本文对这个问题进行了讨论。在进行选型之前，我们需要澄清关于大花诺通属有效出版的争议。这个名字最早出现在描述Notonia Candolle属(1833：518)之后的讨论中。在那次讨论中，大花菊被指定为Notonia的类型。它还被认为是以瓦利奇的《Cacalia Grand diflora》(WALL.猫。3147/257；Wallich 1831)，并附有关于头状花序大小的描述性说明(“ses fleuron on t environ on un pouce de long gueur”[其花约一英寸长])。不久，鬼魂(1834：24)在他的印度植物区系著作中记录了这一点，并提供了更详细的描述。除了沃尔。猫。3147/257年，《鬼魂》(1834年)引用了另一场聚会--鬼魂猫。1485年。一些研究人员(例如，Rani 1983，Mathur 1995，Vanijajiva等人)。2014年)接受，烛台(1833年)已有效地发表了N.Grand diflora，而许多其他(例如，胡克1881年，Triman 1895年，库克1908年，北村和古尔德1982)认为只有后来验证的名称鬼魂(1834年)。根据《深圳法典》(Turland et al.(2018年)，Candolle(1833年)提供的描述虽然很少，但在技术上满足了有效公布姓名的要求(第38.1a条和第38.3条)。因此，Notonia Grand diflora Candolle(1833)是有效的。自从坎多勒(1833年)出版的《大花Notonia》的有效出版物被接受以来，鬼魂猫的聚集。鬼魂(1834年)引用的1485年肯定不应该被认为是这个名字的原始材料。在G-DC中，有6个被标记为[syn]类型的聚集区，即。B.Heyne sn(G00472141，http://www.维尔热。Ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/aDetail。PHP？ID=338485&lang=en)，草本植物。Madras sn(G00472161，http://www.维尔热。Ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/aDetail。PHP？ID=338487&lang=en)；JF Royle246(G00472132，http://www.维尔热。Ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/aDetail。PHP？ID=338489&lang=EN)；PJ Noton sn(G00472156，http://www.维尔热。Ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/aDetail。PHP？ID=338488&lang=EN)，以及鬼魂的两次聚会(G00472160，http://www.维尔热。Ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/aDetail。PHP？ID=338486&lang=EN；和G00472155，http://www.维尔热。Ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/aDetail。PHP？ID=338490&lang=EN)。其中，1834年烛台收到了鬼魂(G00472155)的一次聚会，明显可以追溯到坎多勒(1833年)。JF Royle 246是在1833年收集的，但也可能收到后的烛台(1833年)，因为它是由Candolle(1838年)在他的序言引用，但没有提到在Candolle(1833年)。因此，它们也不应该是大花菊的原始材料。剩下的四个是与WALL相关的聚会。猫。3147/257(Wallich 1831)，据说大花菊就是以此为基础的(Candolle 1833)。因此，它们充当了这个名字的类型词。其中，PJ Noton sn保存最好，被定为大花莲的选型。
Notonia grandiflora Candolle (1833: 518)(Asteraceae: Senecioneae) is a succulent subshrub endemic to Indian peninsula and northern Thailand (Trimen 1895, Kitamura & Gould 1982, Mathur 1995, Vanijajiva et al. 2014). It is currently accepted as Kleinia grandiflora (DC.) Rani (1983: 801). So far, the name has not been typified, and the issue is dealt with in this paper.Before the lectotypification, we need to clarify the controversy over the valid publication of Notonia grandiflora. The name first appeared in the discussion following the description of the genus of Notonia Candolle (1833: 518). In that discussion, N. grandiflora was designated as the type of Notonia. It was also stated to be based on Wallich’s “Cacalia grandiflora”(Wall. Cat. 3147/257; Wallich 1831), and accompanied by a descriptive statement of the size of capitula (“ses fleurs ont environ un pouce de longueur”[its flowers are about an inch in length]). Soon later, Wight (1834: 24) recorded it in his work on the flora of India, and provided more detailed descriptions. Apart from Wall. Cat. 3147/257, Wight (1834) cited another gathering, Wight Cat. 1485. Some researchers (eg, Rani 1983, Mathur 1995, Vanijajiva et al. 2014) accepted that Candolle (1833) had validly published N. grandiflora, while many others (eg, Hooker 1881, Trimen 1895, Cooke 1908, Kitamura & Gould 1982) considered the name only validated later by Wight (1834). According to Shenzhen Code (Turland et al. 2018), the description provided by Candolle (1833), although minimal, has technically satisfied the requirement of valid publication of a name (Art. 38.1 a and Art. 38.3). Notonia grandiflora Candolle (1833) is thus valid. Since the valid publication of Notonia grandiflora by Candolle (1833) is accepted, the gathering of Wight Cat. 1485 cited by Wight (1834) surely should not be considered as the original material of the name. In G-DC, there are six gatherings labeled as the [syn] types of Notonia grandiflora, viz. B. Heyne sn (G00472141, http://www. ville-ge. ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/adetail. php? id= 338485&lang= en), Herb. Madras sn (G00472161, http://www. ville-ge. ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/adetail. php? id= 338487&lang= en); JF Royle 246 (G00472132, http://www. ville-ge. ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/adetail. php? id= 338489&lang= en); PJ Noton sn (G00472156, http://www. ville-ge. ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/adetail. php? id= 338488&lang= en), and two gatherings of Wight (G00472160, http://www. ville-ge. ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/adetail. php? id= 338486&lang= en; and G00472155, http://www. ville-ge. ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/chg/adetail. php? id= 338490&lang= en). Among them, a gathering of Wight (G00472155) was received by Candolle in 1834, clearly postdating Candolle (1833). JF Royle 246 was collected in 1833, but probably also received after the publication of Candolle (1833), because it was cited by Candolle (1838) in his Prodromus but not mentioned in Candolle (1833). Therefore, they should not be the original material of N. grandiflora either. The remaining four are the gatherings associated with Wall. Cat. 3147/257 (Wallich 1831), on which N. grandiflora was stated to be based (Candolle 1833). They thus serve as the syntypes of the name. Among them, PJ Noton sn was best preserved and is here designated as the lectotype of N. grandiflora.