The uniqueness of the helicoid
The uniqueness of the helicoid
复制标题
DOI:
10.4007/annals.2005.161.727
复制
发表时间:
2005-03
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
W. Meeks;H. Rosenberg
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Meeks;H. Rosenberg
In this paper we will discuss the geometry of finite topology properly embedded minimal surfaces M in R3. M of finite topology means M is homeomorphic to a compact surface M̂ (of genus k and empty boundary) minus a finite number of points p1, ..., pj ∈ M̂ , called the punctures. A closed neighborhood E of a puncture in M is called an end of M . We will choose the ends sufficiently small so they are topologically S1 × [0, 1) and hence, annular. We remark that M̂ is orientable since M is properly embedded in R3. The simplest examples (discovered by Meusnier in 1776) are the helicoid and catenoid (and a plane of course). It was only in 1982 that another example was discovered. In his thesis at Impa, Celso Costa wrote down the Weierstrass representation of a complete minimal surface modelled on a 3-punctured torus. He observed the three ends of this surface were embedded: one top catenoidtype end1, one bottom catenoid-type end, and a middle planar-type end2 [8]. Subsequently, Hoffman and Meeks [15] proved this example is embedded and they constructed for every finite positive genus k embedded examples of genus k and three ends. In 1993, Hoffman, Karcher and Wei [14] discovered the Weierstrass data of a complete minimal surface of genus one and one annular end. Computer generated pictures suggested this surface is embedded and the end is asymptotic to an end of a helicoid. Hoffman, Weber and Wolf [17] have now given a proof that there is such an embedded surface. Moreover, computer evidence suggests that one can add an arbitrary finite number k of handles to a helicoid to obtain a properly embedded genus k minimal surface asymptotic to a helicoid. For many years, the search went on for simply connected examples other than the plane and helicoid. We shall prove that there are no such examples.