Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data

Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/bib/bbu004
复制
发表时间:
2015-03-01
影响因子:
9.5
通讯作者:
Hautaniemi, Sampsa
Hautaniemi, Sampsa
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Alkodsi, Amjad;Louhimo, Riku;Hautaniemi, Sampsa

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

体细胞拷贝数改变(SCNAs)是影响肿瘤发病机制的重要结构变异类型。准确检测具有SCNA的基因组区域对于癌症基因组学至关重要,因为这些区域包含癌症发展的可能驱动因素。深度测序技术提供单核苷酸分辨率的基因组数据,被认为是检测SCNA的最佳测量技术之一。尽管已经开发了几种算法来从全基因组和全外显子组测序数据中检测SCNA,但尚未研究它们的相对性能。在这里,我们比较了模拟和原发性肿瘤深度测序数据中的十种SCNA检测算法。此外,我们还评估了外显子组测序数据用于SCNA检测的适用性。我们的研究结果表明,(i)算法之间的灵敏度和特异性存在明显差异,(ii)SCNA检测算法能够识别大多数复杂的染色体改变,(iii)外显子组测序数据适用于SCNA检测。
Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) are an important type of structural variation affecting tumor pathogenesis. Accurate detection of genomic regions with SCNAs is crucial for cancer genomics as these regions contain likely drivers of cancer development. Deep sequencing technology provides single-nucleotide resolution genomic data and is considered one of the best measurement technologies to detect SCNAs. Although several algorithms have been developed to detect SCNAs from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data, their relative performance has not been studied. Here, we have compared ten SCNA detection algorithms in both simulated and primary tumor deep sequencing data. In addition, we have evaluated the applicability of exome sequencing data for SCNA detection. Our results show that (i) clear differences exist in sensitivity and specificity between the algorithms, (ii) SCNA detection algorithms are able to identify most of the complex chromosomal alterations and (iii) exome sequencing data are suitable for SCNA detection.