Response to Haiman, Kote-Jarai, Darst et al.
Response to Haiman, Kote-Jarai, Darst et al.
复制标题
对 Haiman、Kote-Jarai、Darst 等人的回应
DOI:
10.1093/jnci/djad006
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hauger,RichardL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Seibert,TylerM;Pagadala,MeghanaS;Lynch,Julie;Karunamuni,Roshan;Carter,Hannah;Rose,BrentS;Hauger,RichardL
We thank the writers for their interest in our work and for their important contributions to prostate cancer (PCa) genetics. The writers express concern about our emphasis on lethal PCa. We included 3 endpoints: PCa incidence, metastatic PCa, and fatal PCa. Each is clinically relevant. We used Cox regression to evaluate age at occurrence for each endpoint. This approach—common in epidemiology and oncology—offers substantial advantages over logistic regression for case-control status. For example, a man initially diagnosed with Gleason 7 PCa may later develop metastatic PCa or may have an indolent course. Likewise, a man diagnosed with Gleason 6 PCa at age 52 years could very well develop clinically significant PCa in his lifetime. Survival analyses appropriately account for these possibilities, permitting inclusion of early PCa diagnoses in analyses of critical endpoints that early detection strategies intend to avoid (metastatic or fatal PCa).We agree that current polygenic scores are not specific for aggressive disease and have cautioned readers accordingly. Men should be counseled about false-positive prostate-specific antigen tests, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment. We and others are working to develop markers and diagnostic tests specific for lethal PCa. Meanwhile, we noted that existing tools for mitigation of screening harms should be used, including magnetic resonance imaging, blood or urine tests, and active surveillance of favorable-risk PCa.