Veinlite transillumination in the pediatric emergency department - A therapeutic interventional trial

Veinlite transillumination in the pediatric emergency department - A therapeutic interventional trial
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/pec.0b013e318163db5f
复制
发表时间:
2008-02-01
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
Waltzman, Mark L.
Waltzman, Mark L.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Katsogridakis, Yiannis L.;Seshadri, Roopa;Waltzman, Mark L.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:我们假设透照可以增加儿科急诊患者的外周静脉(IV)插入成功率。主要结果是成功的第一次尝试,和次要结果是成功的2 attempts.Methods:我们评估了静脉插入儿科急诊科医生和护士使用的Veinlite(transLite,糖地,得克萨斯州)。需要非紧急IV插入的患者如果年龄小于3岁或年龄在3至21岁之间且有难以进入的病史,则入组。参与者被随机分配到透照或非透照组。使用混合效应logistic回归模型进行分析,调整供应商effect.Results:我们评估了240例患者。在调整了显著协变量(安全导管[P = 0.008]、可见性[P = 0.01]和可触知性[P = 0.03])并控制了提供者效应后,透照患者首次尝试静脉置入更有可能成功(P = 0.03;比值比,2.1 [95%置信区间,1.1-3.91)。在调整了显著的协变量(安全导管[P < 0.001]、位置[P = 0.005]和可触知性[P = 0.05])并控制了提供者的影响后,透照患者在2次尝试内静脉置入更有可能成功(P = 0.01;比值比,3.5 [95%置信区间,1.4-8.9])。群内相关性为随机效应的供应商是10%,在第一次尝试和16%within 2 attempts.Conclusions:调整后的多个显着的协变量和控制随机效应的供应商,我们的研究结果表明,在使用静脉透照插入在第一次尝试和2次尝试内的好处。与标准实践相比,该技术似乎有助于儿科患者的非紧急IV放置。
Objectives: We hypothesized that transillumination would increase peripheral intravenous (IV) insertion success rates in pediatric emergency department patients. Primary outcome was success in first attempt, and secondary outcome was success within 2 attempts.Methods: We evaluated IV insertion by pediatric emergency department physicians and nurses using the Veinlite (TransLite, Sugar Land, Tex). Patients who required nonemergent IV insertion were enrolled if younger than 3 years or aged 3 to 21 years with a history of difficult access. Participants were randomly assigned to transillumination or nontransillumination. Analyses were performed using a mixed-effects logistic regression model adjusting for provider effect.Results: We evaluated 240 patients. After adjusting for significant covariates (safety catheter [P = 0.008), visibility [P = 0.01], and palpability [P = 0.03]) and controlling for provider effect, IV placement was more likely successful in first attempt in transilluminated patients (P = 0.03; odds ratio, 2.1 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.91). After adjusting for significant covariates (safety catheter [P < 0.001], location [P = 0.005], and palpability [P = 0.05]) and controlling for provider effect, IV placement was more likely successful within 2 attempts in transilluminated patients (P = 0.01; odds ratio, 3.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-8.9]). Intracluster correlation for random effect of provider was 10% in first attempt and 16% within 2 attempts.Conclusions: After adjusting for multiple significant covariates and controlling for random effect of provider, our results indicated a benefit in the use of Veinlite transillumination for IV insertion in first attempt and within 2 attempts. This technique seemed to facilitate nonemergent IV placement in pediatric patients compared with standard practice.