Comparison of the direct faecal smear and two thick smear techniques for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections
Comparison of the direct faecal smear and two thick smear techniques for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90304-1
复制
发表时间：
1996-09-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Gryseels, B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Engels, D;Nahimana, S;Gryseels, B
在布隆迪547名保健中心的病人中，比较了加藤厚涂片法的玻璃盖改良法的诊断性能，与目前在基本保健服务中推荐的直接涂片检查和快速加藤-卡茨法的组合诊断肠道寄生虫感染的效果。经典的Kato-Katz方法对常见寄生虫感染的诊断效果最好，特别是与直接检查相结合。对于原生动物，无论是滋养体还是囊肿，直接玻片检查都优于玻璃罩检查。尽管玻璃盖盖技术是一种简单易行的方法，但在基本卫生服务中，不能推荐将其作为诊断肠道寄生虫的首选方法。
Among 547 health centre patients in Burundi, the diagnostic performance of a glass coverslip modification of the Kato thick smear technique was compared with the combination of direct slide examination and the quick Kato-Katz method, currently recommended in basic health services, for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections. The classical Kato-Katz method performed best for the diagnosis of common helminth infections, especially in combination with direct examination. For the diagnosis of protozoa, both trophozoites and cysts, the direct slide examination was superior to the glass coverslip technique. Despite its being a single and easy procedure, the glass coverslip technique could not be recommended as the method of choice for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites in basic health services.