Audiovisual Bounce-Inducing Effect: Attention Alone Does Not Explain Why the Discs Are Bouncing
Audiovisual Bounce-Inducing Effect: Attention Alone Does Not Explain Why the Discs Are Bouncing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0013031
复制
发表时间：
2009-02-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Casco, Clara
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Grassi, Massimo;Casco, Clara
在空间中向前移动的两个相对的圆盘。重叠和停止在另一张光盘的起始点，可以看到它相互反弹或流过对方。在静音显示下，观察者报告光盘为流，而如果光盘相互接触时播放声音，观察者报告光盘为弹跳。从流响应切换到退回响应的原因尚不清楚。声音将感知转向撞击弹性事件的感知(即，弹跳)或减去察觉光盘为流所必需的注意力。我们使用类似冲击(突然幅度攻击，逐渐衰减)或冲击不相似声音(逐渐幅度攻击，突然衰减)，发现第一个声音会诱导跳跃反应。而后者，尽管和第一个一样让人分心，但温柔的流媒体和弹跳的反应最多也就是同样频繁。我们将视听弹跳效应解释为注意力减法的结果，与无声显示相比，注意减法增加了弹跳反应的数量。并从感知中进一步增加反弹反应的数量，并将反应转变为强烈的反弹反应。
Two discs moving front opposite points in space. overlapping and stopping at the other disc's starting point, can be seen its either bouncing or streaming through each other. With silent displays, observers report the discs as streaming, whereas if a sound is played when the discs touch each other, observers report the discs as bouncing. The origin of the switch from streaming to bouncing response is not known yet. The sound either shifts perception toward that of an impact-elastic event (i.e.. a bounce) or subtracts the attention that is necessary to perceive the discs as streaming. We used either impact-similar (abrupt amplitude attack, gradual decay) or impact-dissimilar Sounds (gradual amplitude attack, abrupt decay) and found that the first sounds induce the bouncing response. whereas the latter, although as distracting as the first, tender streaming and bouncing responses equally frequent at most. We interpret the audiovisual bouncing effect as resulting from attention subtraction, which raises the number of bounce responses in comparison with silent displays. and from perception, which further increment,, the number of bounce responses and turns the response into a strong bounce response.