Alpha Helices Are More Robust to Mutations than Beta Strands.
Alpha Helices Are More Robust to Mutations than Beta Strands.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005242
复制
发表时间:
2016-12
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Marsh JA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Abrusán G;Marsh JA
The rapidly increasing amount of data on human genetic variation has resulted in a growing demand to identify pathogenic mutations computationally, as their experimental validation is currently beyond reach. Here we show that alpha helices and beta strands differ significantly in their ability to tolerate mutations: helices can accumulate more mutations than strands without change, due to the higher numbers of inter-residue contacts in helices. This results in two patterns: a) the same number of mutations causes less structural change in helices than in strands; b) helices diverge more rapidly in sequence than strands within the same domains. Additionally, both helices and strands are significantly more robust than coils. Based on this observation we show that human missense mutations that change secondary structure are more likely to be pathogenic than those that do not. Moreover, inclusion of predicted secondary structure changes shows significant utility for improving upon state-of-the-art pathogenicity predictions. The factors that determine the robustness and evolvability of proteins are still largely unknown. In this work the authors show that different secondary structure elements of proteins (helices and strands) differ in their ability to tolerate mutations, and demonstrate that it is caused by differences in the number of non-covalent residue interactions within these secondary structure units. The results suggest that engineering de novo all-alpha proteins should be easier than all-beta ones, as more sequences can to fold to the same topology. Additionally, secondary structure can be used to improve current methods of pathogenicity predictions; mutations that change secondary structure are more likely to be pathogenic than mutations that do not, due to their strong destabilizing effect on protein structure.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.8
作者:
Kucukkal TG;Petukh M;Li L;Alexov E
通讯作者:
Alexov E
影响因子:
8.6
作者:
England, JL;Shakhnovich, EI
通讯作者:
Shakhnovich, EI
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Hecht M;Bromberg Y;Rost B
通讯作者:
Rost B
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Cunningham F;Amode MR;Barrell D;Beal K;Billis K;Brent S;Carvalho-Silva D;Clapham P;Coates G;Fitzgerald S;Gil L;Girón CG;Gordon L;Hourlier T;Hunt SE;Janacek SH;Johnson N;Juettemann T;Kähäri AK;Keenan S;Martin FJ;Maurel T;McLaren W;Murphy DN;Nag R;Overduin B;Parker A;Patricio M;Perry E;Pignatelli M;Riat HS;Sheppard D;Taylor K;Thormann A;Vullo A;Wilder SP;Zadissa A;Aken BL;Birney E;Harrow J;Kinsella R;Muffato M;Ruffier M;Searle SM;Spudich G;Trevanion SJ;Yates A;Zerbino DR;Flicek P
通讯作者:
Flicek P
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1216613110
发表时间:
2013-08-27
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Bromberg, Yana;Kahn, Peter C.;Rost, Burkhard
通讯作者:
Rost, Burkhard