A comparative analysis of fuzzy logic and PI speed control in high performance AC drives using experimental approach
A comparative analysis of fuzzy logic and PI speed control in high performance AC drives using experimental approach
复制标题
DOI：
10.1109/ias.2000.881988
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Z. Ibrahim;E. Levi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Z. Ibrahim;E. Levi
人工智能在运动控制中经常讨论的应用之一是用模糊逻辑（FL）速度控制器代替标准PI速度控制器。不管所有的工作，它似乎是一个彻底的比较PI和FL速度控制下的驱动器的行为，使用实验装置，仍然是失踪。本文试图填补这一空白，通过提供一个深入的比较矢量控制永磁同步电机的操作。速度响应，PI和FL速度控制下获得的，记录和比较各种操作条件。瞬态研究包括响应大步进速度命令从静止与标称惯性和增加的惯性，响应小步进速度参考变化，响应阶跃负载转矩应用和反向瞬态。针对各种初始速度设置检查瞬态行为，以便能够进行全面的比较。结果表明，FL速度控制的优越性是不太明显，它往往是在文献中描绘的基础上有限的比较。实际上，在许多情况下，PI速度控制提供了优越的上级速度响应。
One of the frequently discussed applications of artificial intelligence in motion control is the replacement of a standard PI speed controller with a fuzzy logic (FL) speed controller. Regardless of all the work, it appears that a thorough comparison of the drive behaviour under PI and FL speed control, using an experimental rig, is still missing. This paper attempts to fill in this gap, by providing an in-depth comparison of operation of a vector controlled permanent magnet synchronous motor. Speed responses, obtained under PI and FL speed control, are recorded and compared for a variety of operating conditions. The transients studied include response to large step speed command from standstill with nominal inertia and an increased inertia, response to small step speed reference change, response to step load torque application and reversing transient. The transient behaviour is examined for various initial speed settings, so that a thorough comparison is enabled. It is shown that superiority of the FL speed control is much less pronounced than it is often portrayed in literature on the basis of limited comparisons. Indeed, in a number of cases PI speed control provided a superior speed response.