Exchange bias, training effect, hysteretic behavior of angular dependence, and rotational hysteresis loss in NiFe/FeMn bilayer: Effect of antiferromagnet layer thickness

Exchange bias, training effect, hysteretic behavior of angular dependence, and rotational hysteresis loss in NiFe/FeMn bilayer: Effect of antiferromagnet layer thickness
复制标题

NiFe/FeMn 双层中的交换偏置、训练效应、角度依赖性磁滞行为和旋转磁滞损耗:反铁磁体层厚度的影响

DOI:
10.1063/1.3087450
复制
发表时间:
2009-03
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Zhou, S. M.
Zhou, S. M.
中科院分区:
物理与天体物理3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bai, X. J.;Gao, T. R.;Shi, Z.;Asselin, P.;Du, J.;Zhang, Z. Z.;Chantrell, R.;Zhou, S. M.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

对于NiFe/FeMn双层膜,交换场之间的相关性,双折射率,培训效果,交换偏置的角度依赖性的滞后效应,和旋转滞后损耗已被研究作为反铁磁层厚度tAFM的函数。随着tAFM的增加,所有这些量进行非单调变化,除了在交换领域的单调变化。的最大值的矫顽力,其相对变化,和旋转滞后损失几乎位于相同的tAFM的3.8 nm。在交换场和角度依赖的滞后效应的相对变化的最大值分别位于2.5和3.0 nm。旋转滞后损耗和交换偏置的角度依赖性的滞后行为具有不同的特性。所有物理量随tAFM的变化都可以归因于反铁磁自旋的不可逆反转,这是由Arkrius...
For NiFe/FeMn bilayers, the correlation among the exchange field, the coercivity, the training effect, the hysteretic effect of the angular dependence of the exchange bias, and the rotational hysteresis loss has been studied as a function of the antiferromagnet layer thickness tAFM. With increasing tAFM, all these quantities undergo nonmonotonic variations, except for the monotonic change in the exchange field. The maximal values of the coercivity, its relative change, and the rotational hysteresis loss are almost located at the same tAFM of 3.8 nm. The maximal values of the relative change in the exchange field and of the hysteretic effect of the angular dependence are located at 2.5 and 3.0 nm, respectively. The rotational hysteresis loss and the hysteretic behavior of the angular dependence of the exchange bias have different characteristics. The variations of all physical quantities with tAFM can be ascribed to the irreversible reversal of the antiferromagnet spins, which are governed by the Arrhenius...
DOI: 10.1063/1.373081
发表时间: 2000-04
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
M. Tsunoda;Y. Tsuchiya;T. Hashimoto;M. Takahashi
通讯作者: M. Tsunoda;Y. Tsuchiya;T. Hashimoto;M. Takahashi
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(02)01344-6
发表时间: 2003-04
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
O. Haas;R. Schäfer;L. Schultz;K. Barholz;R. Mattheis
通讯作者: O. Haas;R. Schäfer;L. Schultz;K. Barholz;R. Mattheis
DOI: 10.1063/1.1447869
发表时间: 2002-05
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
K. Zhang;T. Zhao;H. Fujiwara
通讯作者: K. Zhang;T. Zhao;H. Fujiwara
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.96.217205
发表时间: 2006-03
影响因子: 8.6
作者:
Zhi-Pan Li;O. Petracic;R. Morales;J. Olamit;X. Batlle;Kai Liu;I. Schuller
通讯作者: Zhi-Pan Li;O. Petracic;R. Morales;J. Olamit;X. Batlle;Kai Liu;I. Schuller
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.220410
发表时间: 2004-10
期刊: Physical Review B
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
S. Urazhdin;C. Chien
通讯作者: S. Urazhdin;C. Chien