Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability
Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability
复制标题
命令式指令：问责制方向
DOI：
10.1080/08351813.2016.1201737
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Kobin H. Kendrick
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Kent;Kobin H. Kendrick
摘要我们的分析是从这样一个问题出发的：如果单靠语法不足以识别祈使句的动作（例如，提供、指导、警告、乞求等），对话者如何才能认识到特定命令所执行的具体行动？我们认为，命令指令发生后，直接的行动可能首先进行了相关的明确指示的收件人的行动，并默认治疗的失败，其中收件人是负责的行动的缺席。问责取向的隐性性质使双方能够专注于恢复直接行动的渐进性，而不是将违法行为作为主题。数据来自英式英语和美式英语的日常互动。
ABSTRACT Our analysis proceeds from the question that if grammar alone is insufficient to identify the action of an imperative (e.g., offering, directing, warning, begging, etc.), how can interlocutors come to recognize the specific action being performed by a given imperative? We argue that imperative directives that occur after the directed action could have first been relevantly performed explicitly to direct the actions of the recipient and tacitly treat the absence of the action as a failure for which the recipient is accountable. The tacit nature of the accountability orientation enables both parties to focus on restoring progressivity to the directed course of action rather than topicalizing a transgression. Data are from everyday interactions in British and American English.
影响因子：
0.4
作者：
Yijin Wu;Wen Ma
通讯作者：
Yijin Wu;Wen Ma