Distinctions between emotion and mood

Distinctions between emotion and mood
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/02699930541000057
复制
发表时间:
2005-09-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Lane, AM
Lane, AM
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Beedie, CJ;Terry, PC;Lane, AM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

大多数学者都认为,情绪和情绪是相互关联但又截然不同的现象。本研究评估了非学术人群的情绪-情绪差异,并将这些观点与文献中提出的差异进行了比较。对106名参与者的回复进行的内容分析确定了16个主题,其中原因(65%的受访者)、持续时间(40%)、控制(25%)、经历(15%)和后果(14%)是最常被提及的区别。在对学术文献的65篇投稿中,提出了8个主题,其中持续时间(62%)、意向性(41%)、原因(31%)、结果(31%)和功能(18%)是最常被引用的主题。当学者和非学者引用的八个主题按顺序排列时,意见明显有60%的重叠。提供了情绪-情绪区别的数据派生的总结。这些数据应该会被证明是有用的,研究人员有兴趣在情绪和情绪之间建立比目前可用的更清晰的科学区别。
Most academics agree that emotions and moods are related but distinct phenomena. The present study assessed emotion-mood distinctions among a non-academic population and compared these views with distinctions proposed in the literature. Content analysis of responses from 106 participants identified 16 themes, with cause (65% of respondents), duration (40%), control (25%), experience (15%), and consequences (14%) the most frequently cited distinctions. Among 65 contributions to the academic literature, eight themes were proposed, with duration (62% of authors), intentionality (41%), cause (31%), consequences (31%), and function (18%) the most frequently cited. When the eight themes cited by both academics and non-academics were rank ordered, approximately 60% overlap in opinion was evident. A data-derived summary of emotion-mood distinctions is provided. These data should prove useful to investigators interested in developing a clearer scientific distinction between emotion and mood than is currently available.