Relative reliability and validity of the Block Kids Questionnaire among youth aged 10 to 17 years

Relative reliability and validity of the Block Kids Questionnaire among youth aged 10 to 17 years
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jada.2008.02.015
复制
发表时间:
2008-05-01
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zakeri, Issa
Zakeri, Issa
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cullen, Karen Weber;Watson, Kathy;Zakeri, Issa

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这项横断面研究测试的信度和效度块儿童问卷,以评估在过去7天的饮食。在7天的时间内,10至17岁的儿童和青少年通过电话完成了两次24小时的饮食回忆,然后在周末进行了街区儿童问卷调查。重测信度进行了评估,使用组内相关性的18名参与者谁完成了第二块儿童问卷1个月后。使用配对t检验和Pearson相关系数(针对衰减和能量摄入进行调整),对整个样本和年龄组进行了24小时饮食回忆与街区儿童问卷的有效性评估。参与者为83名儿童和青少年(57%为西班牙裔,21%为非洲裔美国人,23%为白色; 53%为女性受试者,平均年龄13岁)。与24小时饮食回忆相比,Block Kids问卷中碳水化合物能量百分比、水果、100%果汁和蔬菜的平均每日消耗值较高,而所有其他类别的平均每日消耗值较低。除蛋白质和水果/蔬菜的能量百分比外,所有可靠性组内相关性均>0.30。对于大多数营养素/食物组,两种膳食评估方法之间的平均值存在显著差异。调整后的相关系数从碳水化合物能量百分比的0.69到谷类食物的-0.03不等,其中60%的食物组12岁的人比12岁的人高
This cross-sectional study tested the reliability and validity of the Block Kids Questionnaire to assess diet during the past 7 days. Within a 7-day period, 10- to 17-year-old children and adolescents completed two 24-hour dietary recalls by telephone, followed by the Block Kids Questionnaire at the end of the week. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlations for 18 participants who completed a second Block Kids Questionnaire 1 month later. Validity of the Block Kids Questionnaire compared to the 24-hour dietary recall was assessed for the whole sample and by age group using paired t tests and Pearson correlation coefficients adjusted for attenuation and energy intake. Participants were 83 children and adolescents (57% Hispanic, 21% African-American, and 23% white; 53% were female subjects, mean age 13 years). The Block Kids Questionnaire mean daily consumption values were higher for percent energy from carbohydrate, and servings of fruit, 100% fruit juice, and vegetables, and lower for all other categories compared to the 24-hour dietary recall. All reliability intraclass correlations were >0.30, except percent energy from protein and fruit/vegetable servings. Significant differences in the means between the two dietary assessment methods were noted for most nutrients/food groups. The adjusted correlation coefficients ranged from 0.69 for percent energy from carbohydrate to -0.03 for grain servings, with 60% of the food group servings 12 years were higher than those aged