Clitic Doubling in Vernacular Medieval Greek
Clitic Doubling in Vernacular Medieval Greek
复制标题
中世纪希腊白话中的附着词双重
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jorie Soltic
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jorie Soltic
本文首次对白话中古希腊语中的派系重叠现象进行了深入研究。首先，在现代希腊语的基础上发展起来的四部分类型学(主题化；右错位；背景化；左错位)非常适用于白话中古希腊语。此外，在中世纪希腊语中，叠句的语用功能与许多现代口语中的功能相同：它将宾语标记为话语的主题(而不是焦点)。为此，明确界定了“话题”的概念，并将其与(指代)“给予”的概念区分开来。本文特别注意了叠句代词的分布，因为它们的位置对话题/焦点的区分是有诊断意义的。创新的是，我的语料库中频繁出现的派系重叠与白话文文本公认的口头话语有关。在这一点上，还讨论了另外两个结构：移位的物主和移位的主语。
This paper provides the first in-depth study of clitic doubling in vernacular Medieval Greek. First, it is shown that the four-part typology (topicalization; right-dislocation; backgrounding; left-dislocation) recently developed on the basis of Modern Greek is perfectly applicable to vernacular Medieval Greek. Moreover, clitic doubling serves the same pragmatic function in Medieval Greek as in many modern spoken languages: it marks an object as the topic of the utterance (as opposed to the focus). For this purpose, the notion of ‘topic’ is clearly defined and distinguished from the concept of (referential) ‘givenness’. Special attention is paid to the distribution of the clitic pronouns, as their position is diagnostic for the topic/focus distinction. Innovatively, the frequent occurrence of clitic doubling in my corpus is associated with the oral discourse which the vernacular texts are acknowledged to adopt. In this regard, two other constructions are discussed: dislocated genitives and dislocated subjects.