The Political Consequences of Social Movements
The Political Consequences of Social Movements
复制标题
社会运动的政治后果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yang Su
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Amenta;Neal Caren;Elizabeth Chiarello;Yang Su
对社会运动的政治后果的研究最近加快了步伐。我们从比较和历史的角度对这项研究进行了评估，重点是民主政治和美国的运动。虽然大多数研究都显示了最大运动的影响，但这项研究并没有讨论运动有多重要。至于运动发挥作用的条件，学者们一直在修改他们最初的假设，即有助于动员的战略、组织形式和政治背景也有助于获得和施加政治影响力。学者们正在探索关于不同行动的生产力以及运动和运动组织在他们所面临的不同政治背景和体制环境中的特点的替代论点。研究人员也在采用更具创新性的研究设计来评估这些更复杂的论点。如果学者们继续通过战略、组织和背景之间的互动进行思考；在议程设定阶段之外解决运动对机构政治进程的影响；从比较和历史的角度来定位案例研究；并在运动和问题之间进行更多的比较，那么学术将会取得最大的进步。
Research on the political consequences of social movements has recently accelerated. We take stock of this research with a focus on movements in democratic polities and the United States in comparative and historical perspective. Although most studies demonstrate the influence of the largest movements, this research has not addressed how much movements matter. As for the conditions under which movements matter, scholars have been revising their initial hypotheses that the strategies, organizational forms, and political contexts that aid mobilization also aid in gaining and exerting political influence. Scholars are exploring alternative arguments about the productivity of different actions and characteristics of movements and movement organizations in the varied political contexts and institutional settings they face. Researchers are also employing more innovative research designs to appraise these more complex arguments. Scholarship will advance best if scholars continue to think through the interactions between strategies, organizations, and contexts; address movement influences on processes in institutional politics beyond the agenda-setting stage; situate case studies in comparative and historical perspective; and make more comparisons across movements and issues.