Assessment of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on the treatment of diabetes mellitus with traditional chinese medicine: a systematic review.
Assessment of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on the treatment of diabetes mellitus with traditional chinese medicine: a systematic review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0070586
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Guo F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wang P;Xu Q;Sun Q;Fan FF;Guo XR;Guo F
在CONTORT 2010年声明发表后，很少有研究评估中文期刊上发表的中医药治疗糖尿病的随机临床试验(RCT)的报道质量。[目的]以《2010年报告》为标准，调查中国主要医学期刊随机对照试验报道质量现状。计算机检索中国国家知识基础数据库2011-01/12在《中医药杂志》、《中华中西医结合杂志》、《中国中医药杂志》上发表的关于中医药治疗糖尿病的随机对照试验。我们排除了被报道为“动物研究”、“体外研究”、“个案研究”或“系统评价”的试验。两名独立评分员在对项目进行深入讨论和理解后，使用CONTORT检查表对所有合格试验的报告质量进行评估。清单中的每一项都根据作者是否报告过而被归类为“是”或“不是”。我们确定了27个随机对照试验。根据CONTORT清单中的37个项目，平均报告百分比为45.0%，其中标题和摘要、介绍、方法、结果、讨论和其他信息的平均报告百分比分别为33.3%、88.9%、36.4%、54.4%、71.6%和14.8%。《中医杂志》、《中华中西医结合杂志》、《中国中医药杂志》的平均报告率分别为42.2%、56.8%、46.0%。这三种期刊上随机对照试验的报道质量不足以让读者评估试验的有效性。我们建议编辑要求作者在报告试验结果时使用CONSORT声明作为出版条件。
After the publication of the CONSORT 2010 statement, few studies have been conducted to assess the reporting quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on treatment of diabetes mellitus with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) published in Chinese journals. To investigate the current situation of the reporting quality of RCTs in leading medical journals in China with the CONSORT 2010 statement as criteria. The China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic database was searched for RCTs on the treatment of diabetes mellitus with TCM published in the Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional & Western Medicine, and the China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica from January to December 2011. We excluded trials reported as “animal studies”, “in vitro studies”, “case studies”, or “systematic reviews”. The CONSORT checklist was applied by two independent raters to evaluate the reporting quality of all eligible trials after discussing and comprehending the items thoroughly. Each item in the checklist was graded as either “yes” or “no” depending on whether it had been reported by the authors. We identified 27 RCTs. According to the 37 items in the CONSORT checklist, the average reporting percentage was 45.0%, in which the average reporting percentage for the “title and abstract”, the “introduction”, the “methods”, the “results”, the “discussion” and the “other information” was 33.3%, 88.9%, 36.4%, 54.4%, 71.6% and 14.8%, respectively. In the Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional & Western Medicine, and the China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica the average reporting percentage was 42.2%, 56.8%, and 46.0%, respectively. The reporting quality of RCTs in these three journals was insufficient to allow readers to assess the validity of the trials. We recommend that editors require authors to use the CONSORT statement when reporting their trial results as a condition of publication.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kunz, R;Oxman, AD
通讯作者：
Oxman, AD
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Dwan, Kerry;Altman, Douglas G.;Williamson, Paula R.
通讯作者：
Williamson, Paula R.
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
He J;Du L;Liu G;Fu J;He X;Yu J;Shang L
通讯作者：
Shang L
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Dasi, Francisco;Mercedes Navarro-Garcia, Maria;Morcillo, Esteban
通讯作者：
Morcillo, Esteban