After Snowden - the evolving landscape of privacy and technology

After Snowden - the evolving landscape of privacy and technology
复制标题

斯诺登之后——隐私和技术不断发展的格局

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Wilton
R. Wilton
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Wilton

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的 本文旨在从一位IT背景的隐私倡导者的角度,对JICES“后斯诺登”特刊的研究报告提供一个非学术的视角。 设计/方法/方式 本文件是在审查了日本、新西兰、中华人民共和国和台湾、西班牙和瑞典的国别报告以及导言文件之后编写的。作者还利用新闻文章等在线资源来证实他对斯诺登后技术隐私保护态度的分析。 结果 斯诺登事件后,人们对网络隐私威胁的普遍看法已经从主要关注商业威胁转变为认识到政府在情报和国家安全领域的活动也会带来重大的隐私风险。斯诺登的披露挑战了我们对拦截能力有效监督的许多假设。公民在这方面的期望在一定程度上取决于各国在公民与政府之间关系方面的经验,并可能迅速演变。合法的执法接触和个人隐私之间的紧张关系仍然难以解决。 独创性/价值 作为一份“观点”文件,这份文件大量借鉴了作者作为隐私和技术主题专家的经验。虽然它因此比关于这个问题的学术论文包含更高比例的意见,但他希望它将激发辩论和进一步的研究。
Purpose This paper aims to provide a non-academic perspective on the research reports of the JICES “Post-Snowden” special edition, from the viewpoint of a privacy advocate with an IT background. Design/methodology/approach This paper was written after reviewing the country reports for Japan, New Zealand, PRC and Taiwan, Spain and Sweden, as well as the Introduction paper. The author has also drawn on online sources such as news articles to substantiate his analysis of attitudes to technical privacy protection post-Snowden. Findings Post-Snowden, the general perception of threats to online privacy has shifted from a predominant focus on commercial threats to a recognition that government activities, in the sphere of intelligence and national security, also give rise to significant privacy risk. Snowden’s disclosures have challenged many of our assumptions about effective oversight of interception capabilities. Citizens’ expectations in this regard depend partly on national experience of the relationship between citizen and government, and can evolve rapidly. The tension between legitimate law enforcement access and personal privacy remains challenging to resolve. Originality/value As a “viewpoint” paper, this submission draws heavily on the author’s experience as a privacy and technology subject-matter expert. Although it therefore contains a higher proportion of opinion than the academic papers in this issue, his hope is that it will stimulate debate and further research.