Development of an Abbreviated Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ-Brief) Using a Machine Learning Approach.
Development of an Abbreviated Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ-Brief) Using a Machine Learning Approach.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/00222194211047631
复制
发表时间：
2022-09
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Hoeft F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Feng L;Hancock R;Watson C;Bogley R;Miller ZA;Gorno-Tempini ML;Briggs-Gowan MJ;Hoeft F
存在几个关键的原因来确定一个成年人是否有阅读障碍（RD），并预测儿童发展RD的可能性，这是已知的主要是遗传传播。成人阅读史问卷（ARHQ）是最常用的自我报告问卷之一。高的ARHQ分数表明，一个成年人有RD作为一个孩子的可能性增加，他们的孩子可能会发展RD。本研究旨在探讨使用ARHQ项目子集（ARHQ-brief）评估成人阅读历史是否同样有效。我们使用了一种机器学习方法，lasso（称为L1正则化），并确定了23个项目中的6个项目，这些项目导致了ARHQ简报。包括97名成人和47名儿童的数据。在ARHQ简介中，我们报告了一个阈值0.323，适用于识别成人RD的既往可能性，灵敏度为72.4%，特异性为81.5%。ARHQ-简短和完整的ARHQ之间的预测性能的比较表明，ARHQ-简短解释了额外的10-35.2%的方差在成人和儿童阅读。此外，我们验证了ARHQ-简短的上级能力，预测阅读能力使用一个独立的样本28名儿童。最后，我们讨论了局限性和未来的发展方向。
Several crucial reasons exist to identify whether an adult has had reading disorder (RD) and to predict a child’s likelihood of developing RD, which is known to be primarily genetically transmitted. The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is among the most commonly used self-reported questionnaires. High ARHQ scores indicate an increased likelihood that an adult had RD as a child, and that their children may develop RD. This study focused on whether using a subset of ARHQ items (ARHQ-brief) could be equally effective and efficient in assessing adults’ reading history. We used a machine learning approach, lasso (known as L1 regularization), and identified 6 of 23 items that resulted in the ARHQ-brief. Data from 97 adults and 47 children were included. With the ARHQ-brief, we report a threshold of 0.323 as suitable to identify past likelihood of RD in adults with a sensitivity of 72.4% and a specificity of 81.5%. Comparison of predictive performances between ARHQ-brief and the full ARHQ showed that ARHQ-brief explained an additional 10–35.2% of the variance in adult and child reading. Further, we validated ARHQ-brief’s superior ability to predict reading ability using an independent sample of 28 children. We close by discussing limitations and future directions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Fostick, Leah;Revah, Hadas
通讯作者：
Revah, Hadas
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Al Dahhan, Noor;Georgiou, George K.;Kirby, John R.
通讯作者：
Kirby, John R.
影响因子：
3
作者：
Bjornsdottir, Gyda;Halldorsson, Jonas G.;Stefansson, Kari
通讯作者：
Stefansson, Kari
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Conlon, EG;Zimmer-Gembeck, MJ;Tucker, M
通讯作者：
Tucker, M
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Deacon, S. Helene;Cook, Kathryn;Parrila, Rauno
通讯作者：
Parrila, Rauno