Ongoing Remote Work, Returning to Working at Work, or in between during COVID-19: What Promotes Subjective Well-being?
Ongoing Remote Work, Returning to Working at Work, or in between during COVID-19: What Promotes Subjective Well-being?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/00221465221150283
复制
发表时间：
2023-01-24
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Moen, Phyllis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fan, Wen;Moen, Phyllis
2019冠状病毒病大流行促使人们大量转向远程工作，随后许多人转向混合动力或完全返回办公室。为了解与工作地点变动相关的主观幸福感模式动态，我们对疫情爆发后曾在某个时间点远程工作的美国员工（N = 1，817）进行了一项具有全国代表性的小组调查（2020年10月和2021年4月）。聚类分析确定了四个模式星座的幸福感的基础上，倦怠，工作与生活冲突，工作和生活满意度。总的来说，重返办公室的压力更大，导致在第二波时处于最佳低压力/高满意度星座的概率显著降低，特别是对于没有照顾义务的男性和女性。偏远和混合安排具有有益的影响;转向混合安排对少数民族男子和受教育程度较低的男子尤其有利，尽管它不利于白色妇女的福祉。
The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated a massive turn to remote work, followed by subsequent shifts for many into hybrid or fully returning to the office. To understand the patterned dynamics of subjective well-being associated with shifting places of work, we conducted a nationally representative panel survey (October 2020 and April 2021) of U.S. employees who worked remotely at some point since the pandemic (N = 1,817). Cluster analysis identified four patterned constellations of well-being based on burnout, work-life conflict, and job and life satisfaction. A total return to office is generally more stressful, leading to significantly lower probabilities of being in the optimal low stress/high satisfaction constellation by Wave 2, especially for men and women without care obligations. Remote and hybrid arrangements have salutary effects; moving to hybrid is especially positive for minority men and less educated men, although it disadvantages White women's well-being.