Towards a Conflict Theory of Recognition: On the Constitution of Relations of Recognition in Conflict
Towards a Conflict Theory of Recognition: On the Constitution of Relations of Recognition in Conflict
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/ejop.12016
复制
发表时间：
2015-12-01
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Celikates, Robin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bertram, Georg W.;Celikates, Robin
在本文中，我们发展了一个认识的个人冲突的能力。我们的目标是克服各种缺陷，可以发现在积极和消极的概念承认。我们首先分析这些概念的典型实例，即由阿克塞尔霍内特和朱迪斯巴特勒提出的。我们这样做是为了表明，这两种立场在以类似的方式阐述承认时是多么的不充分：两者都未能使承认的关系与个人的冲突能力之间的根本联系变得可理解。然后，我们继续重新思考黑格尔的承认观的各个方面，在我们看来，这些方面在关于承认的辩论中被不公正地忽视了：他关注的是冲突中承认关系的构成，以及作为承认行为的作者的地位。在此基础上，我们以更系统的方式阐明我们认为更令人信服的承认概念。这使我们能够在实际环境中对这一概念的某些后果作出姿态，首先是关于政治机构的正当性、作用和结构。
In this paper, we develop an understanding of recognition in terms of individuals' capacity for conflict. Our goal is to overcome various shortcomings that can be found in both the positive and negative conceptions of recognition. We start by analyzing paradigmatic instances of such conceptions-namely, those put forward by Axel Honneth and Judith Butler. We do so in order to show how both positions are inadequate in their elaborations of recognition in an analogous way: Both fail to make intelligible the fundamental nexus between relations of recognition and individuals' capacity for conflict. We then move on to reconsider aspects of Hegel's view of recognition-ones that, from our viewpoint, have been unjustly neglected in the debate about recognition: his focus on the constitution of relations of recognition in conflict and on the status of being an author of acts of recognition. On this basis, we then spell out in a more systematic way what we take to be a more convincing conception of recognition. This puts us in the position to gesture at some consequences of this conception in practical contexts, above all with regard to the justification, role and structure of political institutions..