The Use of Pedometers in Stroke Survivors: Are They Feasible and How Well Do They Defect Steps?

The Use of Pedometers in Stroke Survivors: Are They Feasible and How Well Do They Defect Steps?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.047
复制
发表时间:
2012-03-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Mead, Gillian E.
Mead, Gillian E.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carroll, Sarah L.;Greig, Carolyn A.;Mead, Gillian E.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Carroll SL, Greig CA, Lewis SJ, McMurdo ME, Sniehotta FF, Johnston M, Johnston DW, Scopes J. Mead GE。在中风幸存者中使用计步器:是否可行?计步器检测步数的效果如何?中华医学杂志(英文版);2012;33(3):464 - 464。目的:确定(1)脑卒中患者使用计步器的可行性;(2)计步器与实际步数的吻合程度。设计:观察性一致研究。设置:六冲程单位。参与者:准备出院的独立活动脑卒中患者(N=50)。干预措施:患者被要求使用3个计步器:一个在脖子周围,一个在臀部上方。患者先进行20秒的短暂步行,然后进行6分钟步行测试(6MWT)。录像标准确定标准步数。主要结果测量:计步器记录的步数与观看两次步行的标准录像记录的步数之间的一致性。结果:5例(10%)患者佩戴计步器需要帮助,5例(10%)患者无法读取步数。39%(78%)的人会再次使用计步器。当步速低于0.5m/s时,计步器一般不检测步数。一致性分析表明,即使超过0.5m/s,计步器在短距离步行和6MWT时都少计步数;例如,在短距离步行时,录像机和脖子上的计步器的平均差值为5.93步,而在6MWT时,录像机和计步器的平均差值为32.4步。结论:计步器是可行的,但一般无法检测到0.5m/s以下的步数,而在0.5m/s以上的步数中,计步器会漏记步数。
Carroll SL, Greig CA, Lewis SJ, McMurdo ME, Sniehotta FF, Johnston M, Johnston DW, Scopes J. Mead GE. The use of pedometers in stroke survivors: are they feasible and how well do they detect steps? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:466-70.Objectives: To determine (1) the feasibility of pedometers for stroke patients and (2) the level of agreement between pedometers and actual step count.Design: Observational agreement study.Setting: Six stroke units.Participants: Independently mobile stroke patients (N=50) ready for hospital discharge.Interventions: Patients were asked to apply 3 pedometers: 1 around the neck and 1 above each hip. Patients performed a short walk lasting 20 seconds, then a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Video recordings determined the criterion standard step count.Main Outcome Measure: Agreement between the step count recorded by pedometers and the step count recorded by viewing the criterion standard video recordings of the 2 walks.Results: Five patients (10%) needed assistance to put on the pedometers, and 5 (10%) could not read the step count. Thirtynine (78%) would use pedometers again. Below a gait speed of about 0.5m/s, pedometers did not generally detect steps. Agreement analyses showed that even above 0.5m/s, pedometers undercounted steps for both the short walk and 6MWT; for example, the mean difference between the video recorder and pedometer around the neck was 5.93 steps during the short walk and 32.4 steps during the 6MWT.Conclusions: Pedometers are feasible but generally do not detect steps at gait speeds below about 0.5m/s, and they undercount steps at gait speeds above 0.5m/s.