Researching from the spaces in between? The politics of accountability in studying the British military

Researching from the spaces in between? The politics of accountability in studying the British military
复制标题

从两者之间的空间进行研究?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
H. Gray
H. Gray
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Gray

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文是一个探索的具体经验,试图占据合作和脱离之间的空间进行女权主义知情的,批判性的研究,对英国军队,这样做所提出的伦理问题。它以英国武装部队中家庭虐待的定性研究为例,该研究开始时独立于该机构,后来寻求军方的支持和道德审查。该文件讨论了基于高级别军事接触的研究可能被机构及其优先事项所利用的风险;也就是说,这种研究可能变得军事化。借鉴女权主义者关于问责政治的工作,它还强调了反思机构本身可能采取的军事人口研究方式的重要性。相反,它探讨了脱离军事机构进行这种研究所引起的政治和道德困境,以及这种研究结果可能缺乏细微差别的特点。因此,本文反映了一些研究人员的具体经验,谈判这两个极点之间的空间,以及对政治和伦理问题,这一立场,也产生。
This paper is an exploration of the embodied experience of attempting to occupy the spaces in between collaboration and disengagement in conducting feminist-informed, critical research on the British military, and the ethical questions raised by doing so. It draws for illustration on a qualitative study of domestic abuse in the British Armed Forces, which began independently of the institution before seeking support from and ethical clearance through the military at a later date. The paper discusses the risk that research based on high levels of access to the military may be co-opted by the institution and its priorities; that is, that such research may become militarized. Drawing on feminist work on the politics of accountability, it also highlights the importance of reflecting upon the ways in which research on military populations may be taken up by the institutions themselves. In opposition, it explores the political and ethical quandaries raised by pursuing such research in detachment from the military institution, and the lack of nuance likely to characterize the findings of such a study. The paper thus reflects upon some of the researcher’s embodied experience of negotiating a space between these two poles as well as on the political and ethical questions which this position, too, engenders.
男子气概和叙述过去:研究拒绝在种族隔离军队服役的白人的经验
DOI: 10.1177/1468794106093631
发表时间: 2008
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Conway D
通讯作者: Conway D