Epigenomics: Deciphering non-coding variation with 3D epigenomics.
Epigenomics: Deciphering non-coding variation with 3D epigenomics.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/nrg.2016.161
复制
发表时间:
2016-12-13
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Burgess, Darren J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Burgess, Darren J
a new type of unexplored regulatory element that may need to be considered when genetic variants occur in them. Javierre et al. then used their data sets to interpret non-coding variants from GWAS. They found that haematopoietic PIRs were enriched for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with blood-relevant traits and diseases, but not non-blood traits. This validates the physiological relevance and utility of the data sets but indicates that PCHi-C data from other tissues will be needed for broader application to diverse diseases. The authors integrated PCHi-C data into a bioinformatic pipeline to prioritize likely target genes of disease-associated SNPs and applied it to various autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. They prioritized> 2,500 potential disease-associated genes. Threequarters of these genes were not previously implicated in disease, including genes regulated by long-range interactions, which would have been missed by methods relying on proximity within the primary DNA sequence. Finally, the authors assembled their target genes into an ‘autoimmunity network’for further analysis by the community. In their study, Schmitt et al. carried out Hi-C across 21 diverse primary human tissues and cell types. Analysing an average of 214 million unique chromosome contacts per tissue type, they noticed that some regions displayed particularly high local contact frequencies, which they termed frequently interacting regions (FIREs). FIREs were distinct from previously defined types of chromosome domains such as A/B compartments, topologically associated domains (TADs) and loops, although in general they occurred towards the centre of TADs, partook in numerous intra-TAD interactions and were contained within broader regions of A-compartment active chromatin. Further analyses, including integration with profiles of histone modifications and transcription, revealed that FIREs are highly tissue-type-dependent, frequently occur near (and transcriptionally regulate) cell-identity genes and overlap substantially with chromatin features of active enhancers. Indeed, the overlap was particularly strong for clustered FIREs (‘super-FIREs’), of which almost 100% contained clustered enhancers (‘super-enhancers’) or standard enhancers. Given the likely gene-regulatory activity of FIREs, Schmitt et al. assessed disease relevance, finding that FIREs are enriched for SNPs associated with diseases that affect the particular cell types examined. Analysing pairs of FIREs allowed disease-relevant SNPs to be linked to known and novel target genes. It will be interesting to further explore the value of FIREs in disease genetic studies to determine, for example, whether the typically short-range (< 200 kb) nature of FIRE contacts will allow longer-range regulatory events to be routinely uncovered. However, FIREs might be particularly valuable for studying developmentally dynamic enhancers that regulate multiple target genes. Overall, the studies provide insights into the mechanisms by which non-coding variants regulate target genes and, ultimately, disease phenotypes. They also provide datasets and methodologies for future mining and adoption. The papers represent just a subset of the~ 40 IHEC studies that were coordinately published in Cell Press and other journals, and are available online.